Review and Improvement of Judicial Practice on Trademark Infringement in Parallel Imports

关于是否允许商品平行进口，目前原则上允许已经成为了实践的主流观点，但商品平行进口的商标侵权认定标准，在司法实践中仍有不同做法。鉴于目前我国对这一问题的认识尚有不足之处，本文结合商标平行进口对消费者的利益损害的背景下，主要梳理我国实践中所面临的对合法商标的商品平行进口界定不清楚以及商标侵权判断标准不一的问题。在此基础上结合域外主要国家诸如美国、欧盟、韩国等对商标平行进口可借鉴的法律规制，提出明确境内外商标权利主体同一的标准、明确不具备混淆可能性的标准的完善建议。As to whether to allow parallel importation of goods, it has become the mainstream view in practice in principle, but there are still different practices in judicial practice on the criteria for determining trademark infringement of parallel imports of goods. In view of the fact that China’s understanding of this issue is still insufficient, this paper mainly sorts out the problems faced in China’s practice by combining the damage to the interests of consumers caused by parallel import of trademarks, and the problems faced by China in practice. On this basis, combined with the legal regulations of major foreign countries such as the United States, the European Union, Korea and other countries that can learn from parallel import of trademarks, this paper puts forward suggestions for clarifying the criteria for the identity of domestic and foreign trademark rights subjects and clarifying the criteria for not having the possibility of confusion.