OGLE-2016-BLG-1195Lb: A Sub-Neptune Beyond the Snow Line of an M-dwarf Confirmed by Keck Adaptive Optics

Abstract We present the analysis of high-resolution follow-up observations of OGLE-2016-BLG-1195 using Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics with Keck, seven years after the event’s peak. We resolve the lens, measuring its flux and the relative source-lens proper motion, thus finding the system to be a M p = 10.08 ± 1.18 M ⊕ planet orbiting an M-dwarf, M L = 0.62 ± 0.05 M ⊙ , beyond the snow line, with a projected separation of r ⊥ = 2.24 ± 0.21 au at D L = 7.45 ± 0.55 kpc. Our results are consistent with the discovery paper, which reports values with 1 σ uncertainties based on a single mass–distance constraint from finite source effects. However, both the discovery paper and our follow-up results disagree with the analysis of a different group that also present the planetary signal detection. The latter utilizes Spitzer photometry to measure a parallax signal claiming the system is an Earth-mass planet orbiting an ultracool dwarf. Their parallax signal though is improbable since it suggests a lens star in the disk moving perpendicular to or counter to the Galactic disk rotation. Moreover, microlensing parallaxes can be impacted by systematic errors in the photometry. Therefore, we reanalyze the Spitzer photometry using a pixel level decorrelation model to detrend detector systematics. We find that we cannot confidently recover the same detrended light curve that is likely dominated by systematic errors in the photometric data. The results of this paper act as a cautionary tale that a careful understanding of detector systematics and how they influence astrophysical constraints is crucial.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/adcec2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OGLE-2016-BLG-1195Lb: A Sub-Neptune Beyond the Snow Line of an M-dwarf Confirmed by Keck Adaptive Optics

Sean K. Terry, ‪Clément Ranc, D. P. Bennett, Nicolas B. Cowan et al.
1 citations
The Astronomical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
article

OGLE-2016-BLG-1195Lb: A Sub-Neptune Beyond the Snow Line of an M-dwarf Confirmed by Keck Adaptive Optics

Sean K. Terry, ‪Clément Ranc, D. P. Bennett, Nicolas B. Cowan, J. B. Marquette, Lisa Dang, Andrew A. Cole, Joshua W. Blackman, Naoki Koshimoto, Aikaterini Vandorou, A. Udalski, Jean‐Philippe Beaulieu, Sylvain Cetre, I. A. Bond, Peter Wizinowich, Natalia E. Rektsini, Tarik Bouchoutrouch-Ku, Eduardo Marín, Jim Lyke, Aparna Bhattacharya, Christophe Alard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present the analysis of high-resolution follow-up observations of OGLE-2016-BLG-1195 using Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics with Keck, seven years after the event’s peak. We resolve the lens, measuring its flux and the relative source-lens proper motion, thus finding the system to be a M p = 10.08 ± 1.18 M ⊕ planet orbiting an M-dwarf, M L = 0.62 ± 0.05 M ⊙ , beyond the snow line, with a projected separation of r ⊥ = 2.24 ± 0.21 au at D L = 7.45 ± 0.55 kpc. Our results are consistent with the discovery paper, which reports values with 1 σ uncertainties based on a single mass–distance constraint from finite source effects. However, both the discovery paper and our follow-up results disagree with the analysis of a different group that also present the planetary signal detection. The latter utilizes Spitzer photometry to measure a parallax signal claiming the system is an Earth-mass planet orbiting an ultracool dwarf. Their parallax signal though is improbable since it suggests a lens star in the disk moving perpendicular to or counter to the Galactic disk rotation. Moreover, microlensing parallaxes can be impacted by systematic errors in the photometry. Therefore, we reanalyze the Spitzer photometry using a pixel level decorrelation model to detrend detector systematics. We find that we cannot confidently recover the same detrended light curve that is likely dominated by systematic errors in the photometric data. The results of this paper act as a cautionary tale that a careful understanding of detector systematics and how they influence astrophysical constraints is crucial.

The Astronomical JournalVol. 169(6)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of Tasmania, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.