Analysis of Judicial Considerations in the Case of Fake News Dissemination and Its Impact on Public Order

This research addresses the legal issues surrounding the dissemination of false news, particularly in the case of Decision Number 686/Pid.Sus/2021/PN JKT, which involves the spread of fabricated content on social media. The purpose of this study is to analyze judicial considerations in the legal handling of fake news and its implications on public order. The research employs a normative legal method, using secondary data from the court's decision and analyzing it through document analysis with a case-based and conceptual approach. The results highlight the court's focus on the intentionality of the defendants, their awareness of the false nature of the content, and the potential risks of public unrest. The study concludes that while media freedom is constitutionally protected, it must be exercised responsibly, especially in the digital age, to prevent harm to public order and societal harmony. This case underscores the need for greater media accountability and the balance between freedom of expression and public safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nomos Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i1.2974
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Judicial Considerations in the Case of Fake News Dissemination and Its Impact on Public Order

Lu Sudirman, Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk, Julvina Julvina
Nomos Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Analysis of Judicial Considerations in the Case of Fake News Dissemination and Its Impact on Public Order

Lu Sudirman, Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk, Julvina Julvina
article en

Abstract

This research addresses the legal issues surrounding the dissemination of false news, particularly in the case of Decision Number 686/Pid.Sus/2021/PN JKT, which involves the spread of fabricated content on social media. The purpose of this study is to analyze judicial considerations in the legal handling of fake news and its implications on public order. The research employs a normative legal method, using secondary data from the court's decision and analyzing it through document analysis with a case-based and conceptual approach. The results highlight the court's focus on the intentionality of the defendants, their awareness of the false nature of the content, and the potential risks of public unrest. The study concludes that while media freedom is constitutionally protected, it must be exercised responsibly, especially in the digital age, to prevent harm to public order and societal harmony. This case underscores the need for greater media accountability and the balance between freedom of expression and public safety.

Nomos Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu HukumVol. 5(1)
International University of Batam (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Judicial Considerations in the Case of Fake News Dissemination and Its Impact on Public Order — Lu Sudirman, Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk, et al. · Nomos Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS