Assessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing <i>Pleurotus ostreatus</i> versus <i>Trichoderma virens</i>: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks

Mycelium-based blocks (MBBs) represent an innovative and eco-friendly approach to composite material design, combining fungal mycelium with lignocellulosic biomass to produce sustainable, rapidly regenerating materials with intrinsic hydrophobic properties. This study investigates the fabrication and characterization of MBBs using <italic>Pleurotus ostreatus</italic> (Basidiomycota) as the mycelial binding agent and compares its performance with <italic>Trichoderma virens</italic> (Ascomycota), a non-mushroom mycelial alternative. The performance of both fungal species was assessed using three lignocellulosic substrates: bamboo residues (BRs), spent coffee grounds (SCGs), and rice husks (RHs). Substrates were evaluated individually (100% BRs, SCGs, or RHs) and in binary mixtures at a 50:50 ratio (BRs:SCGs, BRs:RHs, and SCGs:RHs). The physical and mechanical properties—including density, water absorption, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture—were systematically evaluated. Results demonstrated that MBBs composed of BRs and <italic>P. ostreatus</italic> mycelium achieved the highest average compressive strength (0.190 MPa), outperforming <italic>T. virens</italic>-based blocks and other MBB formulations. Additionally, blocks incorporating RHs, SCGs, and <italic>P. ostreatus</italic> exhibited the highest density, reaching 379 kg/m³. In contrast, RH-based blocks with <italic>T. virens</italic> mycelium showed the highest water absorption, at 294.25%. Overall, MBBs utilizing <italic>P. ostreatus</italic> mycelium outperformed those with <italic>T. virens</italic> in key metrics such as density, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture, though water absorption was a notable exception. These findings underscore the potential of MBBs—particularly those incorporating SCGs, BRs, and RHs—as sustainable, non-load-bearing construction materials. Their reduced reliance on conventional resources highlights their promise as eco-friendly alternatives for sustainable applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Fungi
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48130/sif-0025-0007
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing Pleurotus ostreatus versus Trichoderma virens: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks

Sayanh Somrithipol, Preeyaporn Koedrith, Salilaporn Nuankaew, Papichaya Kwantong et al.
4 citations
Studies in Fungi
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
7.00
article

Assessing mycelium-based blocks utilizing Pleurotus ostreatus versus Trichoderma virens: material characterization and substrate ratios of bamboo residues, spent coffee grounds, and rice husks

Sayanh Somrithipol, Preeyaporn Koedrith, Salilaporn Nuankaew, Papichaya Kwantong, Jakkapon Phanthuwongpakdee, Nungnit Wattanavichean, Yuwei Hu, Charuwan Chuaseeharonnachai, Nattawut Boonyuen, Apai Benchaphong, Saofee Dueramae, Apiwish Thongraksa
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Mycelium-based blocks (MBBs) represent an innovative and eco-friendly approach to composite material design, combining fungal mycelium with lignocellulosic biomass to produce sustainable, rapidly regenerating materials with intrinsic hydrophobic properties. This study investigates the fabrication and characterization of MBBs using <italic>Pleurotus ostreatus</italic> (Basidiomycota) as the mycelial binding agent and compares its performance with <italic>Trichoderma virens</italic> (Ascomycota), a non-mushroom mycelial alternative. The performance of both fungal species was assessed using three lignocellulosic substrates: bamboo residues (BRs), spent coffee grounds (SCGs), and rice husks (RHs). Substrates were evaluated individually (100% BRs, SCGs, or RHs) and in binary mixtures at a 50:50 ratio (BRs:SCGs, BRs:RHs, and SCGs:RHs). The physical and mechanical properties—including density, water absorption, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture—were systematically evaluated. Results demonstrated that MBBs composed of BRs and <italic>P. ostreatus</italic> mycelium achieved the highest average compressive strength (0.190 MPa), outperforming <italic>T. virens</italic>-based blocks and other MBB formulations. Additionally, blocks incorporating RHs, SCGs, and <italic>P. ostreatus</italic> exhibited the highest density, reaching 379 kg/m³. In contrast, RH-based blocks with <italic>T. virens</italic> mycelium showed the highest water absorption, at 294.25%. Overall, MBBs utilizing <italic>P. ostreatus</italic> mycelium outperformed those with <italic>T. virens</italic> in key metrics such as density, compressive strength, and modulus of rupture, though water absorption was a notable exception. These findings underscore the potential of MBBs—particularly those incorporating SCGs, BRs, and RHs—as sustainable, non-load-bearing construction materials. Their reduced reliance on conventional resources highlights their promise as eco-friendly alternatives for sustainable applications.

Studies in FungiVol. 10(1)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
7.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.