Validation of an Endopep-suspension immunoassay for the diagnostics of human botulism_suppl

Supplementary methods Testing long-term reagent stabilityIn order to provide a robust in vitro method to replace the MBA, the assay reagents need to remain stable over a defined period of time to ensure reliability of the measurement results.Since most reagents used for the Endopep-SIA were produced as assay prototype in house, it was important to estimate the reagent stability.To this end, two assay reagent kits were produced independently and reagents tested on the day of production as well as 60, 90, 180 and 360 days later.Antibody-coupled beads for toxin extraction, substrate-coupled beads and streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin were stored at 4 C.All other reagents, including the cleavage buffer, were stored at -20C.BoNT/A and B standards were stored as single-use aliquots at -20C.For stability measurements standard curves were recorded with each assay kit.As an estimate of stability, the quantitative range (main manuscript, Tab. 1) was further investigated to ensure the assay was still able to detect and quantify low BoNT concentrations (Fig. S3A, gray area).The concentrations were quantified by considering every measurement of every day as a sample and relative deviation from the respective standard concentration was calculated according to main manuscript, equation (1) for every time point (Fig. S3, colors).If bias was outside of the predefined accuracy range ( 25 % bias + 25 % imprecision + inter-assay CV of the 'low spike', see main manuscript Tab. 2), the timepoint was considered quantitatively instable (Fig. S3B, red dotted lines).Qualitative instability was attributed to time points with relative deviations below the lower accuracy range (Fig. S3B, red shaded area).

Publication Details

Journal
ALTEX
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2412181s
Primary Topic
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of an Endopep-suspension immunoassay for the diagnostics of human botulism_suppl

ALTEX
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
article

Validation of an Endopep-suspension immunoassay for the diagnostics of human botulism_suppl

article en

Abstract

Supplementary methods Testing long-term reagent stabilityIn order to provide a robust in vitro method to replace the MBA, the assay reagents need to remain stable over a defined period of time to ensure reliability of the measurement results.Since most reagents used for the Endopep-SIA were produced as assay prototype in house, it was important to estimate the reagent stability.To this end, two assay reagent kits were produced independently and reagents tested on the day of production as well as 60, 90, 180 and 360 days later.Antibody-coupled beads for toxin extraction, substrate-coupled beads and streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin were stored at 4 C.All other reagents, including the cleavage buffer, were stored at -20C.BoNT/A and B standards were stored as single-use aliquots at -20C.For stability measurements standard curves were recorded with each assay kit.As an estimate of stability, the quantitative range (main manuscript, Tab. 1) was further investigated to ensure the assay was still able to detect and quantify low BoNT concentrations (Fig. S3A, gray area).The concentrations were quantified by considering every measurement of every day as a sample and relative deviation from the respective standard concentration was calculated according to main manuscript, equation (1) for every time point (Fig. S3, colors).If bias was outside of the predefined accuracy range ( 25 % bias + 25 % imprecision + inter-assay CV of the 'low spike', see main manuscript Tab. 2), the timepoint was considered quantitatively instable (Fig. S3B, red dotted lines).Qualitative instability was attributed to time points with relative deviations below the lower accuracy range (Fig. S3B, red shaded area).

ALTEX
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.