Understanding Interaction with Machine Learning through a Thematic Analysis Coding Assistant: A User Study

Interactive Machine Learning (IML) enables users, including non-experts in ML, to iteratively train and improve ML models. However, limited research has been reported on how non-experts interact with these systems. Focusing on thematic analysis as a practical application, we report on a user study where 20 participants interacted with TACA, a functioning IML tool. Thematic analysis involves individual interpretation of ambiguous data, hence it is suited for and can benefit from the iterative customization of models supported by IML. Through a combination of interaction logs and semi-structured interviews, our findings revealed that, by using TACA, participants critically reflected on their analysis, gained new thematic insights, and adapted their interpretative stance. We also document misconceptions of ML concepts, positivist views, and personal blame for poor model performance. We then discuss how applications could be designed to improve the understanding of IML concepts and foster reflexive work practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3711095
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Interaction with Machine Learning through a Thematic Analysis Coding Assistant: A User Study

Enrico Costanza, Amid Ayobi, Mirco Musolesi, Federico Milana
4 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Data Visualization and Analytics
5.10
article

Understanding Interaction with Machine Learning through a Thematic Analysis Coding Assistant: A User Study

Enrico Costanza, Amid Ayobi, Mirco Musolesi, Federico Milana
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Interactive Machine Learning (IML) enables users, including non-experts in ML, to iteratively train and improve ML models. However, limited research has been reported on how non-experts interact with these systems. Focusing on thematic analysis as a practical application, we report on a user study where 20 participants interacted with TACA, a functioning IML tool. Thematic analysis involves individual interpretation of ambiguous data, hence it is suited for and can benefit from the iterative customization of models supported by IML. Through a combination of interaction logs and semi-structured interviews, our findings revealed that, by using TACA, participants critically reflected on their analysis, gained new thematic insights, and adapted their interpretative stance. We also document misconceptions of ML concepts, positivist views, and personal blame for poor model performance. We then discuss how applications could be designed to improve the understanding of IML concepts and foster reflexive work practices.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 9(2)
University College London (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Data Visualization and Analytics
5.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.