Investigating the role of an AI-based assistance system for the decision-making process of pilots– an interview study

The introduction of cockpit assistance systems based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the potential to significantly increase flight safety and efficiency, especially in complex and time-critical situations. However, there is limited understanding how an AI-based system could effectively assist pilots in the decision-making process. This interview study investigates the decision-making process of pilots in a complex decision-making scenario with and without the support of a Level 1B AI-based assistance system (EASA Roadmap 2.0, 2023). In a complex in-flight diversion scenario, the AI-based assistance system (named Virtual Crew Assistant) provides an assessment of the risks and benefits of suitable alternates in a user-friendly interface, enabling a direct comparison of the given alternates. Semi-standardized expert interviews were conducted with 12 commercial aviation pilots. The pilots were asked to perform a decision-making process for a complex scenario - using the conventional FOR-DEC decision-making model - with and without the support of a static prototype of the Virtual Crew Assistant (VCA). During the decision-making process, the experts were instructed to think aloud, and were also requested to rate the workload for each condition. Working with the AI-based system workload was rated significantly lower than working without the AI-based system. In addition, conditions for Trust, Explainable AI, Usability and Limitations of AI-based assistance systems in the cockpit were investigated. Other possible functions of the AI-based system suggested by the experts are given and extending the human-machine interaction to higher collaborative AI-Levels is discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation research procedia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.05.021
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the role of an AI-based assistance system for the decision-making process of pilots– an interview study

Angela Menig, Norman Becker, Johannes P. Kleudgen
Transportation research procedia
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Investigating the role of an AI-based assistance system for the decision-making process of pilots– an interview study

Angela Menig, Norman Becker, Johannes P. Kleudgen
article en

Abstract

The introduction of cockpit assistance systems based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the potential to significantly increase flight safety and efficiency, especially in complex and time-critical situations. However, there is limited understanding how an AI-based system could effectively assist pilots in the decision-making process. This interview study investigates the decision-making process of pilots in a complex decision-making scenario with and without the support of a Level 1B AI-based assistance system (EASA Roadmap 2.0, 2023). In a complex in-flight diversion scenario, the AI-based assistance system (named Virtual Crew Assistant) provides an assessment of the risks and benefits of suitable alternates in a user-friendly interface, enabling a direct comparison of the given alternates. Semi-standardized expert interviews were conducted with 12 commercial aviation pilots. The pilots were asked to perform a decision-making process for a complex scenario - using the conventional FOR-DEC decision-making model - with and without the support of a static prototype of the Virtual Crew Assistant (VCA). During the decision-making process, the experts were instructed to think aloud, and were also requested to rate the workload for each condition. Working with the AI-based system workload was rated significantly lower than working without the AI-based system. In addition, conditions for Trust, Explainable AI, Usability and Limitations of AI-based assistance systems in the cockpit were investigated. Other possible functions of the AI-based system suggested by the experts are given and extending the human-machine interaction to higher collaborative AI-Levels is discussed.

Transportation research procediaVol. 88
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.