From Turing Test to Chinese Room Argument: How to Apply Artificial Intelligence in Aviation

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) with advanced large language model (LLM) offers promising approaches for enhancing the capacity of textual analysis. Both the Turing Test and Chinese Room Argument explore AI’s understanding of human language, although both methodologies have dissimilar interpretation on AI’s ‘intelligence’. Current AI systems have demonstrated the capacity for achieving defined test goals for ‘intelligence’. The aviation industry is increasingly interested in adopting AI to improve efficiency, safety, and cost efficiency; with the Generative Pre-trained Transformers’ (GPT) capability to reduce resource-intensive analytics in accident causation classification. This study investigates the potential and challenges of using AI to analyze human factors involved in aviation accidents based on the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Six subject-matter experts in aviation human factors and AI domain participated in this research. All participants were familiar with the HFACS framework to analyze aviation accident reports and the output of GPT which were based on the prompt engineering developed by the research team. This research creates a framework to perform its initial generation and training using GE 235 accident investigation report from Taiwan Transportation Safety Board (TTSB). Initial discoveries demonstrated that the AI model could populate the sub-dimensions of Level 1 HFACS framework with moderate accuracy, although there remains a high presence of hallucinations in generated outputs, with a lack of reproducibility in consecutive outputs with consistent input data. There are still different opinions on AI applications in real-world operations with ethics and safety concerns. While there is clear potential for GPT models to supplement accident analysis within the HFACS framework, there is still more work to integrate HFACS framework into GPT modelling for effective generation to accident data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation research procedia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.05.033
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Turing Test to Chinese Room Argument: How to Apply Artificial Intelligence in Aviation

Wen‐Chin Li, Thomas J. Wang, David Saunders
Transportation research procedia
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

From Turing Test to Chinese Room Argument: How to Apply Artificial Intelligence in Aviation

Wen‐Chin Li, Thomas J. Wang, David Saunders
article en

Abstract

The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) with advanced large language model (LLM) offers promising approaches for enhancing the capacity of textual analysis. Both the Turing Test and Chinese Room Argument explore AI’s understanding of human language, although both methodologies have dissimilar interpretation on AI’s ‘intelligence’. Current AI systems have demonstrated the capacity for achieving defined test goals for ‘intelligence’. The aviation industry is increasingly interested in adopting AI to improve efficiency, safety, and cost efficiency; with the Generative Pre-trained Transformers’ (GPT) capability to reduce resource-intensive analytics in accident causation classification. This study investigates the potential and challenges of using AI to analyze human factors involved in aviation accidents based on the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Six subject-matter experts in aviation human factors and AI domain participated in this research. All participants were familiar with the HFACS framework to analyze aviation accident reports and the output of GPT which were based on the prompt engineering developed by the research team. This research creates a framework to perform its initial generation and training using GE 235 accident investigation report from Taiwan Transportation Safety Board (TTSB). Initial discoveries demonstrated that the AI model could populate the sub-dimensions of Level 1 HFACS framework with moderate accuracy, although there remains a high presence of hallucinations in generated outputs, with a lack of reproducibility in consecutive outputs with consistent input data. There are still different opinions on AI applications in real-world operations with ethics and safety concerns. While there is clear potential for GPT models to supplement accident analysis within the HFACS framework, there is still more work to integrate HFACS framework into GPT modelling for effective generation to accident data.

Transportation research procediaVol. 88
Ministry of Transportation and Communications (TW), Cranfield University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.