Indeterminism in Kalām and Quantum Mechanics

Over the past 30 years, there has been a growing interest in kalām, accompanied by an increasing cross-disciplinary engagement with Western philosophy and science. This includes the comparative s tudy of kalām and quantum mechanics, where Karen Harding and Muhammad Basil Altaie have emerged as two of the field’s most prominent pioneers. Harding has demonstrated striking similarities between al-Ghazālī’s views and the Copenhagen interpretation, particularly in their conceptualisation of causality and reality. Altaie’s argument for indeterminacy in kalām further reinforces this claim. However, the Muslim experience in drawing parallels between Islam and science should caution against over-eagerness and hasty conclusions in such endeavours. This article adopts a more measured approach by highlighting the fundamental differences that persist between the two disciplines. To achieve this, additional concepts from the kalām tradition are introduced to broaden the existing discourse.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TAFHIM IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56389/tafhim.vol18no1.5
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indeterminism in Kalām and Quantum Mechanics

Mohammad Faizal Abu Zarim
TAFHIM IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Indeterminism in Kalām and Quantum Mechanics

Mohammad Faizal Abu Zarim
article en

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, there has been a growing interest in kalām, accompanied by an increasing cross-disciplinary engagement with Western philosophy and science. This includes the comparative s tudy of kalām and quantum mechanics, where Karen Harding and Muhammad Basil Altaie have emerged as two of the field’s most prominent pioneers. Harding has demonstrated striking similarities between al-Ghazālī’s views and the Copenhagen interpretation, particularly in their conceptualisation of causality and reality. Altaie’s argument for indeterminacy in kalām further reinforces this claim. However, the Muslim experience in drawing parallels between Islam and science should caution against over-eagerness and hasty conclusions in such endeavours. This article adopts a more measured approach by highlighting the fundamental differences that persist between the two disciplines. To achieve this, additional concepts from the kalām tradition are introduced to broaden the existing discourse.

TAFHIM IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary WorldVol. 18(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.