ՎԵՐԱԿԱՆԳՆՈՂ ԿԱՄ ՀԱՇՏԵՑՆՈՂ ԱՐԴԱՐԱԴԱՏՈՒԹՅՈՒՆԸ՝ ՈՐՊԵՍ ԴԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԻՇԽԱՆՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԻՐԱԿԱՆԱՑՄԱՆ ՆՈՐ ՏԻՊ

In this article, the author provides a detailed analysis of the concept of restorative or conciliatory justice as a new type of judicial power implementation. The author explains the essence, goals, and characteristics of this approach to justice, emphasizing that its primary objective is to restore social justice through alternative methods of conflict resolution without resorting to punitive measures. The goal of this approach is not punitive policy but the restoration of social justice through alternative means of resolving conflicts. The article highlights that restorative justice plays a significant role in both civil and criminal proceedings. Examples are provided of how restorative justice tools facilitate faster resolution of disputes, reduce legal costs, and promote reconciliation between parties. The article concludes that restorative justice not only enables parties to resolve conflicts through dialogue but also contributes to the humanization of the legal system. In Armenia, restorative justice is still in the developmental stage but is already being applied to resolve family and civil disputes, including mediation and reconciliation. The author suggests expanding the use of this approach in Armenia, taking into account international experience and existing achievements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2025.1-3-3
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ՎԵՐԱԿԱՆԳՆՈՂ ԿԱՄ ՀԱՇՏԵՑՆՈՂ ԱՐԴԱՐԱԴԱՏՈՒԹՅՈՒՆԸ՝ ՈՐՊԵՍ ԴԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԻՇԽԱՆՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԻՐԱԿԱՆԱՑՄԱՆ ՆՈՐ ՏԻՊ

ARARAT BAYANDURYAN
Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

ՎԵՐԱԿԱՆԳՆՈՂ ԿԱՄ ՀԱՇՏԵՑՆՈՂ ԱՐԴԱՐԱԴԱՏՈՒԹՅՈՒՆԸ՝ ՈՐՊԵՍ ԴԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԻՇԽԱՆՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԻՐԱԿԱՆԱՑՄԱՆ ՆՈՐ ՏԻՊ

ARARAT BAYANDURYAN
article en

Abstract

In this article, the author provides a detailed analysis of the concept of restorative or conciliatory justice as a new type of judicial power implementation. The author explains the essence, goals, and characteristics of this approach to justice, emphasizing that its primary objective is to restore social justice through alternative methods of conflict resolution without resorting to punitive measures. The goal of this approach is not punitive policy but the restoration of social justice through alternative means of resolving conflicts. The article highlights that restorative justice plays a significant role in both civil and criminal proceedings. Examples are provided of how restorative justice tools facilitate faster resolution of disputes, reduce legal costs, and promote reconciliation between parties. The article concludes that restorative justice not only enables parties to resolve conflicts through dialogue but also contributes to the humanization of the legal system. In Armenia, restorative justice is still in the developmental stage but is already being applied to resolve family and civil disputes, including mediation and reconciliation. The author suggests expanding the use of this approach in Armenia, taking into account international experience and existing achievements.

Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.