China's Air Pollution Policy Evolution: Effectiveness, Governance Philosophy and Future OutlookA Literature Review
China's industrialization and rapid economic growth have led to severe air pollution, with significant impacts on public health and the economy. In response to these challenges, the Chinese government has adopted traditional top-down control policies. Over time, however, these policies have gradually demonstrated a limitation, which has led to a shift in national policy toward a more innovative bottom-up approach. The purpose of this paper is to review the effects and impacts of two important policies, the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan and the Dual Carbon Goal. By reviewing the relevant key literature, this study seeks to understand the shift from top-down policies to a more balanced governance model and how this will affect the future of air pollution governance in China. The analysis shows that top-down policies are only effective in the initial stages of pollution governance, but their lack of flexibility leads to implementation challenges at the local level. In contrast, bottom-up approaches, such as those used in China's low-carbon pilot cities, hold great promise for addressing region-specific needs and driving sustainable change. The paper concludes that China has developed a balanced approach to air pollution management that combines top-down and bottom-up elements. However, challenges remain, and future policy recommendations include further strengthening local innovation and public participation to achieve long-term improvements in air quality.
Authors
- Kaichen Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7437-319X)
- Qingfeng Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5192-9181)
- Zhinan Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-5739)
Institutions
- The Ohio State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
- Published
- 2025-05-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.23074
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Policies and Emissions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00