Comparative Study of Deep Learning Model Based Equipment Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis

Bearing fault diagnosis and prognosis are crucial for the effective management of industrial equipment. Due to the automatic feature extraction of Deep Learning (DL) models, many recent studies have focused on using DL for these tasks. However, most studies address only one of these tasks. This study aims to present DL models and their powerful ML tools capable of both fault diagnosis and prognosis on industrial equipment. To identify the best DL model for both tasks, a comparative study is conducted on various DL models and ML tools, including Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), CNN in parallel with LSTM (CNN-LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and transformer models. The ML tools investigated include Recurrent Dropout, Residual Network (ResNet), and Monte Carlo Dropout (MC Dropout). These models are validated using online datasets from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) and Xi’an Jiao Tong University (XJTU-SY) for the task of fault diagnosis. For fault prognosis, datasets from XJTU-SY and IEEE PHM are used. The results demonstrate the superiority of the ResCNN-LSTM model in both fault diagnosis and prognosis tasks. It achieves prediction accuracy of 99.87% and 96.39% and F1-scores of 0.998 and 0.964 for fault diagnosis on the CWRU and XJTU-SY datasets, respectively. Additionally, it shows a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 8.56 and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 12.16 for fault prognosis on the XJTU dataset, and an RMSE of 12.18 using the IEEE PHM bearing dataset. These high performance metrics indicate the model's effectiveness in accurately diagnosing faults and predicting failures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i1.4254
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Deep Learning Model Based Equipment Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis

Chin Seong Lim, Veronica Lestari Jauw, Xianpeng Qiao, Hao Yuan Liow
2 citations
International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
1.73
article

Comparative Study of Deep Learning Model Based Equipment Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis

Chin Seong Lim, Veronica Lestari Jauw, Xianpeng Qiao, Hao Yuan Liow
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Bearing fault diagnosis and prognosis are crucial for the effective management of industrial equipment. Due to the automatic feature extraction of Deep Learning (DL) models, many recent studies have focused on using DL for these tasks. However, most studies address only one of these tasks. This study aims to present DL models and their powerful ML tools capable of both fault diagnosis and prognosis on industrial equipment. To identify the best DL model for both tasks, a comparative study is conducted on various DL models and ML tools, including Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), CNN in parallel with LSTM (CNN-LSTM), Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), and transformer models. The ML tools investigated include Recurrent Dropout, Residual Network (ResNet), and Monte Carlo Dropout (MC Dropout). These models are validated using online datasets from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) and Xi’an Jiao Tong University (XJTU-SY) for the task of fault diagnosis. For fault prognosis, datasets from XJTU-SY and IEEE PHM are used. The results demonstrate the superiority of the ResCNN-LSTM model in both fault diagnosis and prognosis tasks. It achieves prediction accuracy of 99.87% and 96.39% and F1-scores of 0.998 and 0.964 for fault diagnosis on the CWRU and XJTU-SY datasets, respectively. Additionally, it shows a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 8.56 and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 12.16 for fault prognosis on the XJTU dataset, and an RMSE of 12.18 using the IEEE PHM bearing dataset. These high performance metrics indicate the model's effectiveness in accurately diagnosing faults and predicting failures.

International Journal of Prognostics and Health ManagementVol. 16(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.