A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling

Abstract. Questions of landscape scale in coupled channel–hillslope landscape evolution have been a significant focus of geomorphological research for decades. Studies to date have suggested a characteristic landscape length that marks the shift from fluvial channels to hillslopes, limiting fluvial incision and setting the length of hillslopes. The representation of real-world landscapes in slope–area plots, however, makes it challenging to identify the exact transition from hillslopes to channels, owing to the existence of an intermediary colluvial valley region. Without a rigorous explanation for the scaling of the channel hillslope transition, the use of computational models, which are forced to implement a finite grid resolution, is limited by the scaling of the physical parameters of the model relative to the grid resolution. Grid resolution is also tied to the width of channels, which is undetermined without a rigorous explanation of where channels begin. Building on existing work, we demonstrate the existence and implications of the characteristic landscape length and its relationship to grid resolution. We derive the characteristic landscape length as the horizontal length in a one-dimensional landscape evolution framework required to form an inflection point. On a two-dimensional domain, channel heads form in steady state at the characteristic area, the square of the characteristic length, independent of grid resolution. We present a box-counting fractal definition using the grid resolution, revealing that the dimension of the contributing drainage region on steady-state hillslopes is expressed as a multifractal system. In sum, channels have contributing drainage areas, therefore a dimension of 2, whereas, by definition, unchannelized locations or nodes have a dimension between zero and 2, so not a well-defined area. This conceptualization aligns with the scaling of channel width as the square root of drainage area. Since channel heads form at a resolution-independent drainage area, the width of channel heads is not explicitly defined, suggesting that the grid resolution is analogous to the property of channel head width in real-world landscapes, influenced by the particle size. We substantiate this theory with topographic analyses of Gabilan Mesa, California. These findings clarify several unresolved properties of channel–hillslope coupling, with potential for substantially improving the accuracy of coupled landscape evolution models in replicating landscape forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Surface Dynamics
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-13-403-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling

Stuart Grieve, Stewart D. Johnson, Tristram C. Hales, José Antonio Constantine et al.
1 citations
Earth Surface Dynamics
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
article

A fractal framework for channel–hillslope coupling

Stuart Grieve, Stewart D. Johnson, Tristram C. Hales, José Antonio Constantine, Benjamin A. Kargère
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Questions of landscape scale in coupled channel–hillslope landscape evolution have been a significant focus of geomorphological research for decades. Studies to date have suggested a characteristic landscape length that marks the shift from fluvial channels to hillslopes, limiting fluvial incision and setting the length of hillslopes. The representation of real-world landscapes in slope–area plots, however, makes it challenging to identify the exact transition from hillslopes to channels, owing to the existence of an intermediary colluvial valley region. Without a rigorous explanation for the scaling of the channel hillslope transition, the use of computational models, which are forced to implement a finite grid resolution, is limited by the scaling of the physical parameters of the model relative to the grid resolution. Grid resolution is also tied to the width of channels, which is undetermined without a rigorous explanation of where channels begin. Building on existing work, we demonstrate the existence and implications of the characteristic landscape length and its relationship to grid resolution. We derive the characteristic landscape length as the horizontal length in a one-dimensional landscape evolution framework required to form an inflection point. On a two-dimensional domain, channel heads form in steady state at the characteristic area, the square of the characteristic length, independent of grid resolution. We present a box-counting fractal definition using the grid resolution, revealing that the dimension of the contributing drainage region on steady-state hillslopes is expressed as a multifractal system. In sum, channels have contributing drainage areas, therefore a dimension of 2, whereas, by definition, unchannelized locations or nodes have a dimension between zero and 2, so not a well-defined area. This conceptualization aligns with the scaling of channel width as the square root of drainage area. Since channel heads form at a resolution-independent drainage area, the width of channel heads is not explicitly defined, suggesting that the grid resolution is analogous to the property of channel head width in real-world landscapes, influenced by the particle size. We substantiate this theory with topographic analyses of Gabilan Mesa, California. These findings clarify several unresolved properties of channel–hillslope coupling, with potential for substantially improving the accuracy of coupled landscape evolution models in replicating landscape forms.

Earth Surface DynamicsVol. 13(3)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Williams College (US), Cardiff University (GB)
Williams College
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Landslides and related hazards
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.