Spectacle coverage for presbyopia correction and its associated factors among employees of an academic centre in Tehran

Near-vision is important for employees to reach better performance. The prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia ranges from less than 10-90% according to various sociodemographic factors including age, sex, educational level, affordability, and awareness. Current study aims to determine the prevalence of spectacle coverage for presbyopia correction and its associated factors among adult employees of a university. A cross-sectional study was conducted on Tehran University of Medical Sciences' staffs aged ≥ 30 years in 2018-2019. All participants were assessed for distance and near visual acuities. Presbyopia was defined as inability to read 20/50 (N8) at 35 cm despite of corrected distance VA of at least 20/50 in the better eye. Total spectacle coverage for presbyopia was calculated as the number of participants with current near vision spectacle ⁄ number of participants with presbyopia. If persons with presbyopia had spectacles that allowed near vision to improve to 20/50 (N8) or better, it was true near spectacle coverage. Included was 4022 participants with mean (standard deviation) age of years 43.61 (7.92) years (range: 30-75 years). The prevalence of presbyopia was found to be 12.6% (507/4022). The total and true spectacle coverage for presbyopia correction were 35.9% (182/507) and 22.7% (115/507), respectively. Female (OR = 4.89, 95%CI = 1.82-13.18, P = 0.002), age ≥ 45 years (OR = 18.69, 95%CI = 1.69-206.18, P = 0.02), hyperopic refractive error (OR = 5.61, 95%CI = 1.75-17.93, P = 0.004), and poor to fair level of general health (OR = 2.94, 95%CI = 1.16-7.69, P = 0.02) were factors significantly associated with the total spectacle coverage. Academic educational level (OR = 2.76, 95%CI = 1.03-7.45, P = 0.04) and poor to fair general health (OR = 3.45, 95%CI = 1.41-8.33, P = 0.007) affected the true spectacle coverage. Nearly one-third of employees with presbyopia used spectacle for near vision, among whom 63% had true near spectacle. Near spectacle use was higher in elderly females with hyperopia and poor to fair general health. People with academic educational level and poor-fair general health wore true near spectacle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02873-4
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectacle coverage for presbyopia correction and its associated factors among employees of an academic centre in Tehran

Ramin Mehrdad, Fateme Alipour, Parya Abdolalizadeh, Hamidreza Pouragha et al.
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Spectacle coverage for presbyopia correction and its associated factors among employees of an academic centre in Tehran

Ramin Mehrdad, Fateme Alipour, Parya Abdolalizadeh, Hamidreza Pouragha, Mehrdad Esmaili
article en

Abstract

Near-vision is important for employees to reach better performance. The prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia ranges from less than 10-90% according to various sociodemographic factors including age, sex, educational level, affordability, and awareness. Current study aims to determine the prevalence of spectacle coverage for presbyopia correction and its associated factors among adult employees of a university. A cross-sectional study was conducted on Tehran University of Medical Sciences' staffs aged ≥ 30 years in 2018-2019. All participants were assessed for distance and near visual acuities. Presbyopia was defined as inability to read 20/50 (N8) at 35 cm despite of corrected distance VA of at least 20/50 in the better eye. Total spectacle coverage for presbyopia was calculated as the number of participants with current near vision spectacle ⁄ number of participants with presbyopia. If persons with presbyopia had spectacles that allowed near vision to improve to 20/50 (N8) or better, it was true near spectacle coverage. Included was 4022 participants with mean (standard deviation) age of years 43.61 (7.92) years (range: 30-75 years). The prevalence of presbyopia was found to be 12.6% (507/4022). The total and true spectacle coverage for presbyopia correction were 35.9% (182/507) and 22.7% (115/507), respectively. Female (OR = 4.89, 95%CI = 1.82-13.18, P = 0.002), age ≥ 45 years (OR = 18.69, 95%CI = 1.69-206.18, P = 0.02), hyperopic refractive error (OR = 5.61, 95%CI = 1.75-17.93, P = 0.004), and poor to fair level of general health (OR = 2.94, 95%CI = 1.16-7.69, P = 0.02) were factors significantly associated with the total spectacle coverage. Academic educational level (OR = 2.76, 95%CI = 1.03-7.45, P = 0.04) and poor to fair general health (OR = 3.45, 95%CI = 1.41-8.33, P = 0.007) affected the true spectacle coverage. Nearly one-third of employees with presbyopia used spectacle for near vision, among whom 63% had true near spectacle. Near spectacle use was higher in elderly females with hyperopia and poor to fair general health. People with academic educational level and poor-fair general health wore true near spectacle.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Urmia University of Technology (IR), Imam Khomeini Hospital (IR), Urmia University (IR), Farabi Hospital (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Alzahra University (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.