The M31–M33 Interaction: Impact on M31’s Center-of-mass Motion and Satellite Orbits

Abstract Inspired by recent studies of the interaction between the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud and its implications for the Milky Way’s global dynamical history, we investigate how the massive satellite galaxy M33 influences the position and velocity of Andromeda’s (M31) center of mass (COM) as M33 passes through M31’s halo. Using recent six-dimensional phase space measurements for both galaxies, we use backward integration to revisit M33’s orbital history in a massive M31 potential (3 × 10 12 M ⊙ ) for the first time. As previously concluded, we find that a first infall orbit is still the most statistically significant (≳90%) orbital solution for M33, except for a high-mass M31 combined with M31 proper motions from the Hubble Space Telescope (as opposed to Gaia), where there is a greater likelihood (∼65%) of a previous encounter. However, the minimum distance between M33 and M31 during this passage is typically ≥100 kpc, two to three times larger than the distance required to explain M33’s warped stellar and gaseous disks. We quantify the magnitude and direction of M31’s evolving COM position ( R COM ) and velocity ( V COM ) owing to M33, finding R COM ≈ 100–150 kpc at maximum and V COM ≈ 20–40 km s −1 . Furthermore, we explore the implications of this phenomenon for the M31 satellite system, specifically whether M33’s gravitational influence is linked to the lopsided distribution of M31 satellites and whether M33 significantly perturbs the orbits of other M31 satellites. While M33 alone may not explain the lopsided nature of M31’s satellite system, its dynamical impact is nonnegligible and must be accounted for in future dynamical studies of the M31 system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc992
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The M31–M33 Interaction: Impact on M31’s Center-of-mass Motion and Satellite Orbits

Ekta Patel, Nicolás Garavito-Camargo, Ivanna Escala
2 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
2.38
article

The M31–M33 Interaction: Impact on M31’s Center-of-mass Motion and Satellite Orbits

Ekta Patel, Nicolás Garavito-Camargo, Ivanna Escala
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Inspired by recent studies of the interaction between the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud and its implications for the Milky Way’s global dynamical history, we investigate how the massive satellite galaxy M33 influences the position and velocity of Andromeda’s (M31) center of mass (COM) as M33 passes through M31’s halo. Using recent six-dimensional phase space measurements for both galaxies, we use backward integration to revisit M33’s orbital history in a massive M31 potential (3 × 10 12 M ⊙ ) for the first time. As previously concluded, we find that a first infall orbit is still the most statistically significant (≳90%) orbital solution for M33, except for a high-mass M31 combined with M31 proper motions from the Hubble Space Telescope (as opposed to Gaia), where there is a greater likelihood (∼65%) of a previous encounter. However, the minimum distance between M33 and M31 during this passage is typically ≥100 kpc, two to three times larger than the distance required to explain M33’s warped stellar and gaseous disks. We quantify the magnitude and direction of M31’s evolving COM position ( R COM ) and velocity ( V COM ) owing to M33, finding R COM ≈ 100–150 kpc at maximum and V COM ≈ 20–40 km s −1 . Furthermore, we explore the implications of this phenomenon for the M31 satellite system, specifically whether M33’s gravitational influence is linked to the lopsided distribution of M31 satellites and whether M33 significantly perturbs the orbits of other M31 satellites. While M33 alone may not explain the lopsided nature of M31’s satellite system, its dynamical impact is nonnegligible and must be accounted for in future dynamical studies of the M31 system.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 985(1)
Space Telescope Science Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
2.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The M31–M33 Interaction: Impact on M31’s Center-of-mass Motion and Satellite Orbits — Ekta Patel, Nicolás Garavito-Camargo, et al. · The Astrophysical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS