AI regulation: maintaining interoperability through value-sensitive standardisation

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) regulatory frameworks are being used to emphasise specific values in previously purely technical areas. One clear example is the European Union’s (EU) AI Act regulation, which sets rules on AI while relying on technical standards to guide compliance and strengthen global cooperation. However, it also states that regulatory efforts have to be in accordance with Union values. Hence, we analyse the EU's approach as an example of the importance that values have gained in AI regulatory frameworks and standards. Therein, we argue that diverse conceptions of values could prevent interoperability between AI systems across regulatory contexts. To illustrate our argumentation, we identify values stated in AI regulatory frameworks from the EU, the United States and China and compare them according to the Theory of Basic Values. The comparison highlights that maintaining interoperability is crucial for regulatory frameworks and standards aiming to advance AI-based systems’ successful deployment and function in and across different regulatory contexts. Consequently, we propose a value-sensitive AI standardisation approach based on our analysis of AI regulatory values, a previous ISO/IEC/IEEE standard’s approach and value sensitive design. Our approach aims to relate AI regulatory values to requirements in AI regulations and provide suggestions for value-based configurability in AI standards. While we find there is no harmonised approach for the embedment of value-based consideration in AI standardisation, this could be a tool used to maintain the interoperability of AI systems that have global reach. Our proposed approach aims to address this shortcoming within the interplay of global AI markets and regulatory strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-025-09832-7
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI regulation: maintaining interoperability through value-sensitive standardisation

Timo Ali-Vehmas, Ana Paula Gonzalez Torres
4 citations
Ethics and Information Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
article

AI regulation: maintaining interoperability through value-sensitive standardisation

Timo Ali-Vehmas, Ana Paula Gonzalez Torres
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) regulatory frameworks are being used to emphasise specific values in previously purely technical areas. One clear example is the European Union’s (EU) AI Act regulation, which sets rules on AI while relying on technical standards to guide compliance and strengthen global cooperation. However, it also states that regulatory efforts have to be in accordance with Union values. Hence, we analyse the EU's approach as an example of the importance that values have gained in AI regulatory frameworks and standards. Therein, we argue that diverse conceptions of values could prevent interoperability between AI systems across regulatory contexts. To illustrate our argumentation, we identify values stated in AI regulatory frameworks from the EU, the United States and China and compare them according to the Theory of Basic Values. The comparison highlights that maintaining interoperability is crucial for regulatory frameworks and standards aiming to advance AI-based systems’ successful deployment and function in and across different regulatory contexts. Consequently, we propose a value-sensitive AI standardisation approach based on our analysis of AI regulatory values, a previous ISO/IEC/IEEE standard’s approach and value sensitive design. Our approach aims to relate AI regulatory values to requirements in AI regulations and provide suggestions for value-based configurability in AI standards. While we find there is no harmonised approach for the embedment of value-based consideration in AI standardisation, this could be a tool used to maintain the interoperability of AI systems that have global reach. Our proposed approach aims to address this shortcoming within the interplay of global AI markets and regulatory strategies.

Ethics and Information TechnologyVol. 27(2)
Aalto University (FI)
University of Oxford, European Commission, Academy of Finland, Aalto-Yliopisto, Koneen Säätiö
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.