Patient-reported outcome of bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy: A cross- sectional study

• Median satisfaction of patients post-mastectomy was equal to or higher than reference. • Better satisfaction in the CRRM group, likely due to the cancer diagnosis. • Most women had no regrets about the surgery, choosing it due to cancer fear and anxiety. • Procedure reduces anxiety and breast cancer incidence, but does not improve survival. • Further studies needed due to study limitations: low response rate, short follow-up. There is a lack of studies evaluating patient satisfaction after a risk-reducing mastectomy using validated instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after risk-reducing mastectomy and primary implant reconstruction. We retrospectively collected and interviewed all patients who underwent risk-reducing mastectomy and implant reconstruction at the Breast Unit of the Kepler University Hospital Linz (Austria) between 2011 and 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: The first group included patients who underwent bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and the second group included those who underwent contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy. The results were analysed separately. A total of 114 patients with a high risk of breast cancer were selected for this study. Of these patients who met the inclusion criteria, 78 completed the questionnaire: 43 underwent a contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) and 35 underwent a bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM). Both groups showed high overall satisfaction, with the CRRM group achieving a slightly better result that reached statistical significance in the domain “satisfaction with breasts” (69 vs. 58, p=0.011). More than 80% of patients would repeat this operation. The most important factor that guided patients toward a risk-reducing procedure was the fear of cancer. In our study, favorable PROs and satisfaction were observed after risk-reducing mastectomies. These results may help physicians to counsel women at high risk of breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next research.
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100431
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-reported outcome of bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy: A cross- sectional study

Peter Schrenk, Samuel R. Schuster, Marco Affortunati, N. Brandstetter et al.
1 links
Next research.
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Patient-reported outcome of bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy: A cross- sectional study

Peter Schrenk, Samuel R. Schuster, Marco Affortunati, N. Brandstetter, Peter Oppelt, Caroline Preuß
article en

Abstract

• Median satisfaction of patients post-mastectomy was equal to or higher than reference. • Better satisfaction in the CRRM group, likely due to the cancer diagnosis. • Most women had no regrets about the surgery, choosing it due to cancer fear and anxiety. • Procedure reduces anxiety and breast cancer incidence, but does not improve survival. • Further studies needed due to study limitations: low response rate, short follow-up. There is a lack of studies evaluating patient satisfaction after a risk-reducing mastectomy using validated instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after risk-reducing mastectomy and primary implant reconstruction. We retrospectively collected and interviewed all patients who underwent risk-reducing mastectomy and implant reconstruction at the Breast Unit of the Kepler University Hospital Linz (Austria) between 2011 and 2021. The patients were divided into two groups: The first group included patients who underwent bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and the second group included those who underwent contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy. The results were analysed separately. A total of 114 patients with a high risk of breast cancer were selected for this study. Of these patients who met the inclusion criteria, 78 completed the questionnaire: 43 underwent a contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) and 35 underwent a bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM). Both groups showed high overall satisfaction, with the CRRM group achieving a slightly better result that reached statistical significance in the domain “satisfaction with breasts” (69 vs. 58, p=0.011). More than 80% of patients would repeat this operation. The most important factor that guided patients toward a risk-reducing procedure was the fear of cancer. In our study, favorable PROs and satisfaction were observed after risk-reducing mastectomies. These results may help physicians to counsel women at high risk of breast cancer.

Next research.Vol. 2(3)
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT)
Kepler Universitätsklinikum
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.