GIS and Public Engagement: ‘Geo-Spatial Support’ and the Space of Flows

For thirty years, the social GIS literature has warned that powerful mapping technologies can become normalized in society through naïve empiricism. Technologies come to seem value-free and even to transcend history in their usefulness, while at the same time, underpinning power laden networks that promote uneven development. Supporting the findings of the present study, the public participation GIS (PPGIS) literature has argued that few meaningful paths to participation in local planning exist. Here, three major findings are presented based on previous ethnographic case study research in a Central California city: 1) Even when used without dynamic mathematical models, GIS leverages time in flows of space. 2) To accomplish this, GIS coordinates spatial and spatialized information which is then used to avoid public scrutiny in local planning. 3) This convergence of power-knowledge and dominance has created a virtually hidden ‘internal’ space within cities connected to what Manuel Castells terms the space of flows. These findings suggest that the usefulness of GIS in local planning centers on the manipulation of space and, to a larger degree than in other mapping technology, time. In this way, technologies like GIS gain power by following more closely the flows of space in nature. This paper discusses the spatial implications of these findings bridging the structuralist and post structuralist theories of Manuel Castells, David Harvey, and Michel Foucault, concluding with policy suggestions for a more empowered community GIS in planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.135005
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GIS and Public Engagement: ‘Geo-Spatial Support’ and the Space of Flows

Rebecca Lee van Stokkum
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Geographic Information Systems Studies
article

GIS and Public Engagement: ‘Geo-Spatial Support’ and the Space of Flows

Rebecca Lee van Stokkum
article en

Abstract

For thirty years, the social GIS literature has warned that powerful mapping technologies can become normalized in society through naïve empiricism. Technologies come to seem value-free and even to transcend history in their usefulness, while at the same time, underpinning power laden networks that promote uneven development. Supporting the findings of the present study, the public participation GIS (PPGIS) literature has argued that few meaningful paths to participation in local planning exist. Here, three major findings are presented based on previous ethnographic case study research in a Central California city: 1) Even when used without dynamic mathematical models, GIS leverages time in flows of space. 2) To accomplish this, GIS coordinates spatial and spatialized information which is then used to avoid public scrutiny in local planning. 3) This convergence of power-knowledge and dominance has created a virtually hidden ‘internal’ space within cities connected to what Manuel Castells terms the space of flows. These findings suggest that the usefulness of GIS in local planning centers on the manipulation of space and, to a larger degree than in other mapping technology, time. In this way, technologies like GIS gain power by following more closely the flows of space in nature. This paper discusses the spatial implications of these findings bridging the structuralist and post structuralist theories of Manuel Castells, David Harvey, and Michel Foucault, concluding with policy suggestions for a more empowered community GIS in planning.

Open Journal of Social SciencesVol. 13(05)
University of California, Davis (US)
University of California, Davis
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.