The presence and absence of gender and intersectionality in the 2023 NDIS review: a content analysis

While a world-leading initiative, Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) has received criticism for its design and implementation. In particular, gender inequality in access to supports and services remains a significant issue. Was the 2023 NDIS Review successful in addressing the persistent problem of gender inequality? To answer this question, this paper presents a content analysis of key documents produced through the 2023 NDIS Review, to investigate whether and how gender inequality was acknowledged and integrated into the Review's recommendations. The analysis assessed the frequency and conceptualisation of gender-related terms and of the Review's preferred term, 'intersectionality.' The analysis found that the Review documents have limited references to gender-specific terms, often replacing them with 'intersectionality'. However, this preferred term lacked an explicit definition and was operationalised inconsistently. Implied meanings were often diluted from the conceptual origins of intersectionality. This means that gender inequalities have been largely ignored in both the findings and recommendations. We conclude that the gendered foundation of issues is obscured by diluting interpretations of 'intersectionality' to the level of individuals or groups, which sideline systemic critique. Importantly, our article highlights the need for policy makers and researchers to operationalise the term 'intersectionality' deliberately and consistently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02441-2
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The presence and absence of gender and intersectionality in the 2023 NDIS review: a content analysis

Chloe Bryant, Anne‐Maree Sawyer, Maya G. Panisset, Lena Molnar et al.
1 links
International Journal for Equity in Health
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

The presence and absence of gender and intersectionality in the 2023 NDIS review: a content analysis

Chloe Bryant, Anne‐Maree Sawyer, Maya G. Panisset, Lena Molnar, Diana K. Piantedosi, E. Paul J. Gibbs, Raelene Wilding
article en

Abstract

While a world-leading initiative, Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) has received criticism for its design and implementation. In particular, gender inequality in access to supports and services remains a significant issue. Was the 2023 NDIS Review successful in addressing the persistent problem of gender inequality? To answer this question, this paper presents a content analysis of key documents produced through the 2023 NDIS Review, to investigate whether and how gender inequality was acknowledged and integrated into the Review's recommendations. The analysis assessed the frequency and conceptualisation of gender-related terms and of the Review's preferred term, 'intersectionality.' The analysis found that the Review documents have limited references to gender-specific terms, often replacing them with 'intersectionality'. However, this preferred term lacked an explicit definition and was operationalised inconsistently. Implied meanings were often diluted from the conceptual origins of intersectionality. This means that gender inequalities have been largely ignored in both the findings and recommendations. We conclude that the gendered foundation of issues is obscured by diluting interpretations of 'intersectionality' to the level of individuals or groups, which sideline systemic critique. Importantly, our article highlights the need for policy makers and researchers to operationalise the term 'intersectionality' deliberately and consistently.

International Journal for Equity in HealthVol. 24(1)
Royal Women's Hospital (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Breast Cancer Network Australia (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Australian Government, La Trobe University
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.