Differences in root biomass among wheat varieties shown by a qPCR assay wheat root DNA in soil samples

Abstract Aims Root research on field-grown crops is hindered by the difficulty of estimating root biomass in soil. Root washing, the current standard method is laborious and expensive. Biochemical methods to quantify root biomass in soil, targeting species-specific DNA, have potential as a more efficient assay. We combined an efficient DNA extraction method, designed specifically to extract DNA from soil, with well-established quantitative PCR methods to estimate the root biomass of 22 wheat varieties grown in field trials over two seasons. We also developed an assay for estimating root biomass for black-grass, a common weed of wheat cultivation. Methods Two robust qPCR assays were developed to estimate the quantity of plant root DNA in soil samples, one specific to wheat and barley, and a second specific to black-grass. Results The DNA qPCR method was comparable, with high correlations, with the results of root washing from soil cores taken from winter wheat field trials. The DNA qPCR assay showed both variety and depth as significant factors in the distribution of root biomass in replicated field trials. Conclusions The results suggest that these DNA qPCR assays are a useful, high-throughput tool for investigating the genetic basis of wheat root biomass distribution in field-grown crops, and the impact of black-grass root systems on crop production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Genetic Resources
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479262124000492
Primary Topic
Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in root biomass among wheat varieties shown by a qPCR assay wheat root DNA in soil samples

Huw Jones, Tracy A. Valentine, Alison Jane Karley, C. A. White et al.
Plant Genetic Resources
Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
article

Differences in root biomass among wheat varieties shown by a qPCR assay wheat root DNA in soil samples

Huw Jones, Tracy A. Valentine, Alison Jane Karley, C. A. White, Lesley A. Boyd, Lydia M. J. Smith
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aims Root research on field-grown crops is hindered by the difficulty of estimating root biomass in soil. Root washing, the current standard method is laborious and expensive. Biochemical methods to quantify root biomass in soil, targeting species-specific DNA, have potential as a more efficient assay. We combined an efficient DNA extraction method, designed specifically to extract DNA from soil, with well-established quantitative PCR methods to estimate the root biomass of 22 wheat varieties grown in field trials over two seasons. We also developed an assay for estimating root biomass for black-grass, a common weed of wheat cultivation. Methods Two robust qPCR assays were developed to estimate the quantity of plant root DNA in soil samples, one specific to wheat and barley, and a second specific to black-grass. Results The DNA qPCR method was comparable, with high correlations, with the results of root washing from soil cores taken from winter wheat field trials. The DNA qPCR assay showed both variety and depth as significant factors in the distribution of root biomass in replicated field trials. Conclusions The results suggest that these DNA qPCR assays are a useful, high-throughput tool for investigating the genetic basis of wheat root biomass distribution in field-grown crops, and the impact of black-grass root systems on crop production.

Plant Genetic ResourcesVol. 23(5)
Mansfield University (US), James Hutton Institute (GB), Agricultural Development Advisory Service (United Kingdom) (GB)
Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division, Directorate for Biological Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.