Exploring Predictors of Bullying Perpetration Among Adolescents Using Machine Learning Approach

This study used machine learning methods to detect risk and protective factors for bullying perpetration in adolescents. The study sample consisted of 777 students with an age range of 11 to 16 years old. Multidimensional data covering both individual and environmental levels were collected. Individual factors included moral disengagement, normative beliefs about aggression, neuroticism, and self-control; environmental factors included parent-child relationships, deviant peer affiliation, school connection, and violent media exposure. The current study tested and compared six machine learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Stacking, to detect risk and protective factors for bullying behavior. The results demonstrated that: (a) the Random Forest algorithm performed optimally, with recall, F1 score, and area under the curve values of 0.9394, 0.8516, and 0.8043, respectively; (b) both Gini importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values identified self-control as the most significant protective factor, while moral disengagement was identified as the most influential risk factor. The recommended model not only provides an application value in preventing bullying but also provides a scientific basis for developing targeted interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251336348
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Predictors of Bullying Perpetration Among Adolescents Using Machine Learning Approach

Huaibin Jiang, Huiling Zhou, Jiamei Lu, Qingying Zheng
3 citations
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
7.32
article

Exploring Predictors of Bullying Perpetration Among Adolescents Using Machine Learning Approach

Huaibin Jiang, Huiling Zhou, Jiamei Lu, Qingying Zheng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study used machine learning methods to detect risk and protective factors for bullying perpetration in adolescents. The study sample consisted of 777 students with an age range of 11 to 16 years old. Multidimensional data covering both individual and environmental levels were collected. Individual factors included moral disengagement, normative beliefs about aggression, neuroticism, and self-control; environmental factors included parent-child relationships, deviant peer affiliation, school connection, and violent media exposure. The current study tested and compared six machine learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Stacking, to detect risk and protective factors for bullying behavior. The results demonstrated that: (a) the Random Forest algorithm performed optimally, with recall, F1 score, and area under the curve values of 0.9394, 0.8516, and 0.8043, respectively; (b) both Gini importance and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values identified self-control as the most significant protective factor, while moral disengagement was identified as the most influential risk factor. The recommended model not only provides an application value in preventing bullying but also provides a scientific basis for developing targeted interventions.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Fujian Normal University (CN), Shanghai Normal University (CN), Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Fujian Provincial Federation of Social Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
7.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.