Mapping the landscape of corporate avoided emissions accounting methodologies

Increasing numbers of companies are disclosing estimates for avoided emissions caused by their products and services, with over 2000 companies reporting this to CDP in 2022. However, there appears to be a proliferation of attempts to standardise the quantification of avoided emissions, creating a crowded and complex landscape. This issue is therefore directly relevant to the current update process undertaken by the GHG Protocol. In order to provide an overview of developments in this field, this paper presents the results of a comprehensive mapping exercise of published methodologies and guidance based on responses to the 2022 CDP questionnaire, prior expert knowledge, and a web database search. In addition, the CDP data was analysed to show which methodologies are used most frequently. The research identifies 48 methodologies for avoided emissions quantification published since 2005 with an in recent years. However, an important finding is that a significant proportion of companies do not use a published methodology or cite the use of inappropriate methodologies calling into question the quality of disclosures on avoided emissions. On the basis of this research we recommend that the Greenhouse Gas Protocol should bring standardisation to this field of accounting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Management
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2504936
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the landscape of corporate avoided emissions accounting methodologies

Matthew Brander, Michelle O’Keeffe
2 citations
Carbon Management
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
article

Mapping the landscape of corporate avoided emissions accounting methodologies

Matthew Brander, Michelle O’Keeffe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Increasing numbers of companies are disclosing estimates for avoided emissions caused by their products and services, with over 2000 companies reporting this to CDP in 2022. However, there appears to be a proliferation of attempts to standardise the quantification of avoided emissions, creating a crowded and complex landscape. This issue is therefore directly relevant to the current update process undertaken by the GHG Protocol. In order to provide an overview of developments in this field, this paper presents the results of a comprehensive mapping exercise of published methodologies and guidance based on responses to the 2022 CDP questionnaire, prior expert knowledge, and a web database search. In addition, the CDP data was analysed to show which methodologies are used most frequently. The research identifies 48 methodologies for avoided emissions quantification published since 2005 with an in recent years. However, an important finding is that a significant proportion of companies do not use a published methodology or cite the use of inappropriate methodologies calling into question the quality of disclosures on avoided emissions. On the basis of this research we recommend that the Greenhouse Gas Protocol should bring standardisation to this field of accounting.

Carbon ManagementVol. 16(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.