Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs

Available floor space allocation recommendations are based on considerably lighter market-weight pigs than currently in the United States (i.e., ~130 kg). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual floor space allocation on overall growth performance and carcass characteristics of pigs raised to >135 kg. Over 49 d, three floor space per pig allocations were tested: 0.88, 0.75, and 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. When the average weight of pigs in the barn reached 135 kg, the heaviest pigs from each pen were marketed in four cuts, approximately one week apart. Overall, weekly feed disappearance per pig, the mean body weights of pigs, and gain:feed was not affected by floor space allocation (<i>p</i> > 0.10). Pigs remaining in pens with 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig tended (<i>p</i> < 0.09) to be lighter after the first cut than pigs raised with 0.88 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. However, there was no difference in body weight between the floor space allocations when the final group was marketed (143.9 ± 0.6 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.13). Carcass lean percent tended (<i>p</i> = 0.08) to be greater (56.8 vs. 56.4%) from pigs provided 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig of floor space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15101451
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs

Crystal Lynette Levesque, Joseph Darrington, R C Thaler, Benoit St‐Pierre et al.
1 citations
Animals
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
article

Effect of Pen Space Allowances on Growth Performance of Finishing Pigs

Crystal Lynette Levesque, Joseph Darrington, R C Thaler, Benoit St‐Pierre, Ryan S Samuel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Available floor space allocation recommendations are based on considerably lighter market-weight pigs than currently in the United States (i.e., ~130 kg). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of individual floor space allocation on overall growth performance and carcass characteristics of pigs raised to >135 kg. Over 49 d, three floor space per pig allocations were tested: 0.88, 0.75, and 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. When the average weight of pigs in the barn reached 135 kg, the heaviest pigs from each pen were marketed in four cuts, approximately one week apart. Overall, weekly feed disappearance per pig, the mean body weights of pigs, and gain:feed was not affected by floor space allocation (<i>p</i> > 0.10). Pigs remaining in pens with 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig tended (<i>p</i> < 0.09) to be lighter after the first cut than pigs raised with 0.88 m<sup>2</sup>/pig. However, there was no difference in body weight between the floor space allocations when the final group was marketed (143.9 ± 0.6 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.13). Carcass lean percent tended (<i>p</i> = 0.08) to be greater (56.8 vs. 56.4%) from pigs provided 0.61 m<sup>2</sup>/pig of floor space.

AnimalsVol. 15(10)
South Dakota State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.