Bound to Be Free?

Abstract The theme of covenant leads us to think simultaneously about both God’s freedom and God’s binding to creation. It may thus help us gain a deeper understanding both of the freedom God enjoys and the kind of necessity that ensues from God’s decision to be “God with,” rather than merely God a se , in se , and pro se . In the Scriptures, we see different “models” of covenant – some reciprocal and mutually conditioned, others unilateral and eternal. Rather than systematize these various models by unifying and homogenizing them, discerning their distinctive features may be a better avenue for a covenant theology today. In the New Testament too, we find different ways of presenting the newness of Jesus Christ in relation to the covenant(s) as depicted in the Hebrew Scriptures. The final section of the paper seeks to show how, in the first two chapters of Luke’s gospel, God’s committed freedom, God’s free commitment, is exercised through this newness, not as replacing or as abrogating ancient traditions, but as fulfilling them: the point is to render witness to the renewing of the one covenant, not to present a “new” covenant in the sense of a “second” covenant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2025-0007
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bound to Be Free?

Christophe Chalamet
Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Bound to Be Free?

Christophe Chalamet
article en

Abstract

Abstract The theme of covenant leads us to think simultaneously about both God’s freedom and God’s binding to creation. It may thus help us gain a deeper understanding both of the freedom God enjoys and the kind of necessity that ensues from God’s decision to be “God with,” rather than merely God a se , in se , and pro se . In the Scriptures, we see different “models” of covenant – some reciprocal and mutually conditioned, others unilateral and eternal. Rather than systematize these various models by unifying and homogenizing them, discerning their distinctive features may be a better avenue for a covenant theology today. In the New Testament too, we find different ways of presenting the newness of Jesus Christ in relation to the covenant(s) as depicted in the Hebrew Scriptures. The final section of the paper seeks to show how, in the first two chapters of Luke’s gospel, God’s committed freedom, God’s free commitment, is exercised through this newness, not as replacing or as abrogating ancient traditions, but as fulfilling them: the point is to render witness to the renewing of the one covenant, not to present a “new” covenant in the sense of a “second” covenant.

Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und ReligionsphilosophieVol. 68(1)
University of Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.