Live Performance in the Age of Technological Mediatisation

ABSTRACT Based on research into the work of live performers in the UK during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic and utilising Walter Benjamin's (1969) concept of authentic, or ‘auratic’ art, this article examines the use of livestreaming platforms by these performers during this time. In doing so, it reveals how, despite structural inequalities, this technology offered performers not only the chance to continue working but also to broaden ideas about what constitutes the auratic qualities of live performance. Specifically, as interactive livestreaming technology expanded the performative space of 'live', it also enhanced the scope for intersubjective participation amongst a wider audience. As a consequence, it provided a means for performers to sustain their livelihoods and explore new ways for their work to remain meaningful and immediate, thereby raising questions about the role of ontology as a yardstick to evaluate the nature of ‘live’ entertainment and the work that produces it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Technology Work and Employment
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12342
Primary Topic
Cinema and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Live Performance in the Age of Technological Mediatisation

Philip Hancock, Melissa Tyler
New Technology Work and Employment
Cinema and Media Studies
article

Live Performance in the Age of Technological Mediatisation

Philip Hancock, Melissa Tyler
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Based on research into the work of live performers in the UK during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic and utilising Walter Benjamin's (1969) concept of authentic, or ‘auratic’ art, this article examines the use of livestreaming platforms by these performers during this time. In doing so, it reveals how, despite structural inequalities, this technology offered performers not only the chance to continue working but also to broaden ideas about what constitutes the auratic qualities of live performance. Specifically, as interactive livestreaming technology expanded the performative space of 'live', it also enhanced the scope for intersubjective participation amongst a wider audience. As a consequence, it provided a means for performers to sustain their livelihoods and explore new ways for their work to remain meaningful and immediate, thereby raising questions about the role of ontology as a yardstick to evaluate the nature of ‘live’ entertainment and the work that produces it.

New Technology Work and EmploymentVol. 40(3)
University of Essex (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Cinema and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Live Performance in the Age of Technological Mediatisation — Philip Hancock, Melissa Tyler · New Technology Work and Employment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS