ETHICAL CODES OF AI DEVELOPMENT AND USE. THE ISSUE OF APPLICATION

The article analyzes codes of ethics and other non–legal documents designed to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) systems at all stages of life cycle, from idea and development to implementation and use. The analysis is based on four documents that ought to regulate AI within large territories; three of the four documents are international. The professional codes of ethics of AI developers’ organizations were taken as auxiliary ones. The author concludes that the following values are protected in all documents: human rights; the benefit of humanity (all people), i.e. humanity as a whole should be the beneficiary of the AI implementation; cultural diversity, non-discrimination. The article shows that reality strongly contradicts the rhetoric of the considered codes of ethics and documents, and, as a result, serious concerns arise during following the codes. In particular, the documents ignore or bypass the issue of military conflicts and the use of AI on the warfare whereas such use has long been a reality. The rhetoric of the codes is based on certain narratives and does not take into account popular concepts in social philosophy. Within the framework of the Marxist approach, the postulated values in the modern world cannot be respected. Humanity cannot be the beneficiary of the AI introduction while capitalism is widespread.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series Philosophy Social Studies Art Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2025-1-50-62
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ETHICAL CODES OF AI DEVELOPMENT AND USE. THE ISSUE OF APPLICATION

O.V. Savvina
RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series Philosophy Social Studies Art Studies
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

ETHICAL CODES OF AI DEVELOPMENT AND USE. THE ISSUE OF APPLICATION

O.V. Savvina
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes codes of ethics and other non–legal documents designed to regulate artificial intelligence (AI) systems at all stages of life cycle, from idea and development to implementation and use. The analysis is based on four documents that ought to regulate AI within large territories; three of the four documents are international. The professional codes of ethics of AI developers’ organizations were taken as auxiliary ones. The author concludes that the following values are protected in all documents: human rights; the benefit of humanity (all people), i.e. humanity as a whole should be the beneficiary of the AI implementation; cultural diversity, non-discrimination. The article shows that reality strongly contradicts the rhetoric of the considered codes of ethics and documents, and, as a result, serious concerns arise during following the codes. In particular, the documents ignore or bypass the issue of military conflicts and the use of AI on the warfare whereas such use has long been a reality. The rhetoric of the codes is based on certain narratives and does not take into account popular concepts in social philosophy. Within the framework of the Marxist approach, the postulated values in the modern world cannot be respected. Humanity cannot be the beneficiary of the AI introduction while capitalism is widespread.

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series Philosophy Social Studies Art Studies(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ETHICAL CODES OF AI DEVELOPMENT AND USE. THE ISSUE OF APPLICATION — O.V. Savvina · RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series Philosophy Social Studies Art Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS