Enhancing Science Process Skills of Freshmen Science Education Students through Course-Based Undergraduate Research

This study assesses the enhancement of science process skills (SPS) among freshman secondary science education students at a state university though Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE). A mixed-method research design was utilized, employing mean, standard deviation, and paired sample t-tests for quantitative analysis, while thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data. Results indicated overall improvement, with classifying reaching a competent level and most basic SPS progressing from beginner to advanced beginner. However, communication remained a weak area, and integrated SPS, such as formulating questions/hypotheses and interpreting data, showed high scores but no qualitative gains. Significant improvements were observed in five basic SPS (observing, inferring, predicting, measuring, and communicating) and four integrated SPS (making operational definitions, controlling and manipulating variables, experimenting, and formulating models). Challenges, including time constraints, research complexity, and limited prior experience, particularly affected data analysis and scientific writing. Qualitative findings highlighted three key themes: strengthening research skills through hands-on learning, building confidence by overcoming research-related challenges, and developing effective research strategies through literature review and writing. While CURE enhanced SPS, additional supports, such as extended research timelines and writing workshops, are recommended to further strengthen students' science process competencies

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in humanities and modern education research;
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70114/ahmer.2025.2.1.p59
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Science Process Skills of Freshmen Science Education Students through Course-Based Undergraduate Research

Minie L. Bulay, Louella S. Degamon
Advances in humanities and modern education research;
Innovative Teaching Methods
article

Enhancing Science Process Skills of Freshmen Science Education Students through Course-Based Undergraduate Research

Minie L. Bulay, Louella S. Degamon
article en

Abstract

This study assesses the enhancement of science process skills (SPS) among freshman secondary science education students at a state university though Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE). A mixed-method research design was utilized, employing mean, standard deviation, and paired sample t-tests for quantitative analysis, while thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data. Results indicated overall improvement, with classifying reaching a competent level and most basic SPS progressing from beginner to advanced beginner. However, communication remained a weak area, and integrated SPS, such as formulating questions/hypotheses and interpreting data, showed high scores but no qualitative gains. Significant improvements were observed in five basic SPS (observing, inferring, predicting, measuring, and communicating) and four integrated SPS (making operational definitions, controlling and manipulating variables, experimenting, and formulating models). Challenges, including time constraints, research complexity, and limited prior experience, particularly affected data analysis and scientific writing. Qualitative findings highlighted three key themes: strengthening research skills through hands-on learning, building confidence by overcoming research-related challenges, and developing effective research strategies through literature review and writing. While CURE enhanced SPS, additional supports, such as extended research timelines and writing workshops, are recommended to further strengthen students' science process competencies

Advances in humanities and modern education research;Vol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Innovative Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.