The Effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning–Based Instructional Material in Cell Biology

This study investigates the effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in cell biology education, focusing on student performance. It compares experimental and control groups to evaluate how CLIL enhances both content comprehension and language development. A mixed-methods approach integrates quantitative GPA analysis over three years with qualitative data from observations and interviews. Statistical analysis reveals significant differences (p < 0.05) in academic performance between schools using CLIL and those employing traditional methods. The thematic analysis highlights the effectiveness of CLIL instructional materials in promoting structured learning, visual appeal, and accuracy, leading to improved language acquisition and content knowledge. CLIL emerges as a promising pedagogical approach that enhances scientific understanding, language proficiency, critical thinking, and communication skills. Its integration into curricula supports deeper learning and prepares students for global challenges, reinforcing its potential to enrich educational practices in specialized scientific domains

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in humanities and modern education research;
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70114/ahmer.2025.2.1.p127
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning–Based Instructional Material in Cell Biology

Julie S. Berame, Loujane Gray Y. Radaza
Advances in humanities and modern education research;
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

The Effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning–Based Instructional Material in Cell Biology

Julie S. Berame, Loujane Gray Y. Radaza
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in cell biology education, focusing on student performance. It compares experimental and control groups to evaluate how CLIL enhances both content comprehension and language development. A mixed-methods approach integrates quantitative GPA analysis over three years with qualitative data from observations and interviews. Statistical analysis reveals significant differences (p < 0.05) in academic performance between schools using CLIL and those employing traditional methods. The thematic analysis highlights the effectiveness of CLIL instructional materials in promoting structured learning, visual appeal, and accuracy, leading to improved language acquisition and content knowledge. CLIL emerges as a promising pedagogical approach that enhances scientific understanding, language proficiency, critical thinking, and communication skills. Its integration into curricula supports deeper learning and prepares students for global challenges, reinforcing its potential to enrich educational practices in specialized scientific domains

Advances in humanities and modern education research;Vol. 2(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.