Confucianism Revisited — The Role of Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Against the backdrop of the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence—which is profoundly reshaping social structures and value orders—ethical and subjectivity crises are becoming increasingly acute, demanding a timely cultural response. As a pivotal strand of China’s intellectual treasury, Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind—anchored in the propositions “the mind is principle,” “there is nothing outside the mind and no principle outside the mind,” and the imperative to “extend innate knowledge (liangzhi)”—offers deep resources for addressing the technological and axiological dilemmas raised by AI. This paper systematically traces the theoretical lineage of Yangming studies and, engaging current debates on “quasi-subjective AI,” “algorithmic ethics,” and “human–machine affective relations,” analyzes how Wang’s thought can meet the ethical challenges posed by contemporary artificial intelligence. It advances innovative pathways such as the “Prudent-Self Algorithm,” a “Conscience-oriented Educational Model,” the “Confucian Moralization of AI Art,” and a “Cultural Ontology for Global Governance,” thereby illustrating the bidirectional empowerment of “humanizing technology through Confucianism and revealing Confucianism through technology.” Findings indicate that Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind possesses the intellectual resilience to confront the challenges of digital civilization and can play a distinctive role in shaping a new paradigm of humanistic governance for the AI era—serving as a crucial fulcrum for the modern transformation of Chinese culture and for global value dialogue

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in humanities and modern education research;
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70114/ahmer.2025.2.1.p185
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confucianism Revisited — The Role of Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Z.-J Li
1 citations
Advances in humanities and modern education research;
Educational Reforms and Innovations
1.20
article

Confucianism Revisited — The Role of Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Z.-J Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence—which is profoundly reshaping social structures and value orders—ethical and subjectivity crises are becoming increasingly acute, demanding a timely cultural response. As a pivotal strand of China’s intellectual treasury, Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind—anchored in the propositions “the mind is principle,” “there is nothing outside the mind and no principle outside the mind,” and the imperative to “extend innate knowledge (liangzhi)”—offers deep resources for addressing the technological and axiological dilemmas raised by AI. This paper systematically traces the theoretical lineage of Yangming studies and, engaging current debates on “quasi-subjective AI,” “algorithmic ethics,” and “human–machine affective relations,” analyzes how Wang’s thought can meet the ethical challenges posed by contemporary artificial intelligence. It advances innovative pathways such as the “Prudent-Self Algorithm,” a “Conscience-oriented Educational Model,” the “Confucian Moralization of AI Art,” and a “Cultural Ontology for Global Governance,” thereby illustrating the bidirectional empowerment of “humanizing technology through Confucianism and revealing Confucianism through technology.” Findings indicate that Wang Yangming’s Philosophy of Mind possesses the intellectual resilience to confront the challenges of digital civilization and can play a distinctive role in shaping a new paradigm of humanistic governance for the AI era—serving as a crucial fulcrum for the modern transformation of Chinese culture and for global value dialogue

Advances in humanities and modern education research;Vol. 2(1)
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.