Associations Between Hearing Loss and Dementia in a Large Electronic Health Record System

ABSTRACT Objectives Epidemiologic analyses of hearing loss utilize national volunteer‐based datasets that are restricted by limited variables and few individuals with severe disease. We overcome these limitations using two large electronic health records to study whether audiometric hearing loss is associated with dementia. Methods This was a cross‐sectional, multicentered retrospective study using the electronic health records at the academic medical centers of Columbia University and Cornell University ( n = 31,997 total) for participants ≥ 18 years old with clinical audiometry from February 1, 2020 through May 5, 2023. Hearing measures were from the better ear and included pure tone average, word recognition score, and speech reception threshold. Dementia was defined as ICD‐10 diagnosis code only, dementia medications only, the presence of both conditions, and the presence of either condition. Odds ratios were computed from univariable and multivariable logistic regressions between hearing loss and dementia with 95% confidence intervals, using the covariates of age, sex, cardiovascular risk score, and site. Results The mean age (SD) in the combined dataset was 60.5 (18.3) years and 18,992 (59.4%) were women. All univariable regressions showed increased odds of dementia with worsening hearing, regardless of how hearing or dementia was defined. Controlling for covariates, for every 10‐dB worsening in hearing by pure tone audiometry, the odds of dementia (as defined by ICD‐code or medication list) increased by 1.11 times (95% CI = 1.07–1.16); for every 10% worsening in word recognition score, the odds of dementia increased by 1.06 times (95% CI = 1.01–1.11); for every 10‐dB worsening of the speech reception threshold, the odds of dementia increased by 1.10 times (95% CI = 1.05–1.15). Conclusions Using a large electronic health record system, audiometric hearing loss defined in three separate ways was associated with increased odds of dementia. Electronic health records can corroborate and expand previously studied relationships between hearing loss and its comorbidities, including dementia. Level of Evidence 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32273
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations Between Hearing Loss and Dementia in a Large Electronic Health Record System

James M. Noble, Samuel H. Selesnick, Maeher R. Grewal, Michael W. Denham et al.
1 citations
The Laryngoscope
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

Associations Between Hearing Loss and Dementia in a Large Electronic Health Record System

James M. Noble, Samuel H. Selesnick, Maeher R. Grewal, Michael W. Denham, Alexander Chern, Mark A. Eckert, Lauren H. Tucker, Rachel E. Weitzman, Justin S. Golub
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Epidemiologic analyses of hearing loss utilize national volunteer‐based datasets that are restricted by limited variables and few individuals with severe disease. We overcome these limitations using two large electronic health records to study whether audiometric hearing loss is associated with dementia. Methods This was a cross‐sectional, multicentered retrospective study using the electronic health records at the academic medical centers of Columbia University and Cornell University ( n = 31,997 total) for participants ≥ 18 years old with clinical audiometry from February 1, 2020 through May 5, 2023. Hearing measures were from the better ear and included pure tone average, word recognition score, and speech reception threshold. Dementia was defined as ICD‐10 diagnosis code only, dementia medications only, the presence of both conditions, and the presence of either condition. Odds ratios were computed from univariable and multivariable logistic regressions between hearing loss and dementia with 95% confidence intervals, using the covariates of age, sex, cardiovascular risk score, and site. Results The mean age (SD) in the combined dataset was 60.5 (18.3) years and 18,992 (59.4%) were women. All univariable regressions showed increased odds of dementia with worsening hearing, regardless of how hearing or dementia was defined. Controlling for covariates, for every 10‐dB worsening in hearing by pure tone audiometry, the odds of dementia (as defined by ICD‐code or medication list) increased by 1.11 times (95% CI = 1.07–1.16); for every 10% worsening in word recognition score, the odds of dementia increased by 1.06 times (95% CI = 1.01–1.11); for every 10‐dB worsening of the speech reception threshold, the odds of dementia increased by 1.10 times (95% CI = 1.05–1.15). Conclusions Using a large electronic health record system, audiometric hearing loss defined in three separate ways was associated with increased odds of dementia. Electronic health records can corroborate and expand previously studied relationships between hearing loss and its comorbidities, including dementia. Level of Evidence 3.

The LaryngoscopeVol. 135(10)
Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, National Institute on Aging
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.