Sustainable Lifespan Re-Extension Management of Energy Facilities: Economic Assessment and Decision-Making Model for Phased Decommissioning

This study proposes a decision-making model based on the economic assessment of phased decommissioning of energy facilities, specifically focusing on a nuclear power plant (NPP). The objective of the research is to develop and validate an economic assessment methodology for comparing immediate and deferred dismantling strategies for a 1000 MW NPP unit. For economic justification, a comparison of the economic expenses is proposed based on the accumulation of radioactive waste, safety activities, and labour costs for the two options. The methods employed include a multifactorial analysis based on expert assessments, considering economic expenses related to radioactive waste accumulation, safety activities, and labour costs. Criteria with differences exceeding 10% for quantitative indicators and fundamental differences for qualitative indicators were deemed significant; each criterion’s acceptability was weighted accordingly. The key results show that deferred dismantling is economically preferable; the total score for deferred dismantling exceeds that of immediate dismantling by approximately 10% (14.16 points vs. 15.86 points). A comparison of block schedules for decommissioning, dynamics of labour costs, and annual volumes of reprocessed radioactive waste for the baseline and optimised deferred dismantling options shows that both options meet the continuity condition of the ‘active’ stages. At the same time, the optimised option demonstrates significant advantages in the uniformity of labour costs and workload of radioactive waste treatment plants during dismantling. The activities at the stage of power unit decommissioning are proposed to be carried out within the licence framework for its operation by the organisational and technical solutions to ensure safety during operation. The deterministic consequences and risks will align with the safety assessment, which will be determined based on the latest analysis results, taking into account sustainable operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104610
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Lifespan Re-Extension Management of Energy Facilities: Economic Assessment and Decision-Making Model for Phased Decommissioning

Aziza B. Karbekova, Hanna Hrinchenko, Olha Prokopenko, Nataliia Antonenko et al.
4 citations
Sustainability
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
2.07
article

Sustainable Lifespan Re-Extension Management of Energy Facilities: Economic Assessment and Decision-Making Model for Phased Decommissioning

Aziza B. Karbekova, Hanna Hrinchenko, Olha Prokopenko, Nataliia Antonenko, Наталія Ковшун, Tetiana Kubakh, Serhii Poliushkin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study proposes a decision-making model based on the economic assessment of phased decommissioning of energy facilities, specifically focusing on a nuclear power plant (NPP). The objective of the research is to develop and validate an economic assessment methodology for comparing immediate and deferred dismantling strategies for a 1000 MW NPP unit. For economic justification, a comparison of the economic expenses is proposed based on the accumulation of radioactive waste, safety activities, and labour costs for the two options. The methods employed include a multifactorial analysis based on expert assessments, considering economic expenses related to radioactive waste accumulation, safety activities, and labour costs. Criteria with differences exceeding 10% for quantitative indicators and fundamental differences for qualitative indicators were deemed significant; each criterion’s acceptability was weighted accordingly. The key results show that deferred dismantling is economically preferable; the total score for deferred dismantling exceeds that of immediate dismantling by approximately 10% (14.16 points vs. 15.86 points). A comparison of block schedules for decommissioning, dynamics of labour costs, and annual volumes of reprocessed radioactive waste for the baseline and optimised deferred dismantling options shows that both options meet the continuity condition of the ‘active’ stages. At the same time, the optimised option demonstrates significant advantages in the uniformity of labour costs and workload of radioactive waste treatment plants during dismantling. The activities at the stage of power unit decommissioning are proposed to be carried out within the licence framework for its operation by the organisational and technical solutions to ensure safety during operation. The deterministic consequences and risks will align with the safety assessment, which will be determined based on the latest analysis results, taking into account sustainable operation.

SustainabilityVol. 17(10)
Sumy State University (UA), Jalalabad State University (KG), Estonian Entrepreneurship University of Applied Sciences (EE), National University of Water and Environmental Engineering (UA), Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenko (UA), Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology (UA), Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies (UA), V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
2.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.