Comparison of Eddy Current Loss Calculation Techniques for Axial Flux Motors with Printed Circuit Board Windings

In slotless machines, the winding conductors are exposed to the magnetic air gap field, which causes additional eddy current losses, thus decreasing efficiency and affecting thermal utilization. This is the case, inter alia, for axial flux motors equipped with printed circuit board windings, where the winding is made of copper–fiberglass epoxy laminations and located in the air gap. The dominant influencing factors are primarily the width of the conducting tracks and the magnetic air gap flux density and frequency. The evaluation time is a crucial constraint when calculating thousands of different designs for design space exploration or performing multi-objective optimizations. Finite element simulations can achieve very precise results, but unlike semi-analytical approximation functions, they are very time-consuming and therefore not the method of choice for design space exploration. This publication provides a comprehensive overview of a selection of different eddy current loss calculation techniques that are applicable for rectangular tracks and round wire windings. A comparison of the calculated results for a finite element simulation is presented for a slotless axial flux machine with printed circuit board windings and rectangular tracks. The calculation time consumed is also compared. The current density distribution of planar conductors of air gap windings differs from that in electrical steel sheets. In contrast to the methods based on steel sheets, only the adapted methods for conductors in air gaps offer acceptable accuracy. A recommendation is provided for the method that offers the best balance between accuracy and computation time for the early-stage design of slotless axial flux machines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18102603
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Eddy Current Loss Calculation Techniques for Axial Flux Motors with Printed Circuit Board Windings

Sven Urschel, Andreas Bauer, Daniel Dieterich
3 citations
Energies
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
2.19
article

Comparison of Eddy Current Loss Calculation Techniques for Axial Flux Motors with Printed Circuit Board Windings

Sven Urschel, Andreas Bauer, Daniel Dieterich
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In slotless machines, the winding conductors are exposed to the magnetic air gap field, which causes additional eddy current losses, thus decreasing efficiency and affecting thermal utilization. This is the case, inter alia, for axial flux motors equipped with printed circuit board windings, where the winding is made of copper–fiberglass epoxy laminations and located in the air gap. The dominant influencing factors are primarily the width of the conducting tracks and the magnetic air gap flux density and frequency. The evaluation time is a crucial constraint when calculating thousands of different designs for design space exploration or performing multi-objective optimizations. Finite element simulations can achieve very precise results, but unlike semi-analytical approximation functions, they are very time-consuming and therefore not the method of choice for design space exploration. This publication provides a comprehensive overview of a selection of different eddy current loss calculation techniques that are applicable for rectangular tracks and round wire windings. A comparison of the calculated results for a finite element simulation is presented for a slotless axial flux machine with printed circuit board windings and rectangular tracks. The calculation time consumed is also compared. The current density distribution of planar conductors of air gap windings differs from that in electrical steel sheets. In contrast to the methods based on steel sheets, only the adapted methods for conductors in air gaps offer acceptable accuracy. A recommendation is provided for the method that offers the best balance between accuracy and computation time for the early-stage design of slotless axial flux machines.

EnergiesVol. 18(10)
University of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.