Spatial Planning Reform in China: The Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) Reform

Compared to many other countries, China has a very complicated spatial planning system. This is mainly reflected in the multi-horizontal and multi-vertical structure. Vertically, it comprises five administrative levels: national, provincial, prefecture, county, and township. Horizontally, it encompasses four or more distinct major plans found at each level. Administrative processes and procedures frequently cut-through horizontal and vertical boundaries, adding complexity that results in four forms of fragmentation: <br/>(1) actor fragmentation because there is limited flexibility for each administrative unit to align its plans with other units; <br/>(2) policy fragmentation, with multiple and sometimes conflicting spatial plans and planning laws existing simultaneously; <br/>(3) spatial fragmentation with inconsistencies in zoning of different land types; and <br/>(4) time fragmentation characterized by conflicts between short- and long-term development goals. <br/>The result is an inefficient planning system that requires tremendous coordination for project approval and implementation. A reform of the spatial planning system, known as the Multi-Plan Integration Reform (MPI), arose in the 1990s and continues until today. This contribution explains the origin, evolution, and the results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Planning Theory & Practice
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2025.2499319
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Planning Reform in China: The Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) Reform

Lasse Gerrits, Jurian Edelenbos, Cai Min
Planning Theory & Practice
Urbanization and City Planning
article

Spatial Planning Reform in China: The Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) Reform

Lasse Gerrits, Jurian Edelenbos, Cai Min
article en

Abstract

Compared to many other countries, China has a very complicated spatial planning system. This is mainly reflected in the multi-horizontal and multi-vertical structure. Vertically, it comprises five administrative levels: national, provincial, prefecture, county, and township. Horizontally, it encompasses four or more distinct major plans found at each level. Administrative processes and procedures frequently cut-through horizontal and vertical boundaries, adding complexity that results in four forms of fragmentation: <br/>(1) actor fragmentation because there is limited flexibility for each administrative unit to align its plans with other units; <br/>(2) policy fragmentation, with multiple and sometimes conflicting spatial plans and planning laws existing simultaneously; <br/>(3) spatial fragmentation with inconsistencies in zoning of different land types; and <br/>(4) time fragmentation characterized by conflicts between short- and long-term development goals. <br/>The result is an inefficient planning system that requires tremendous coordination for project approval and implementation. A reform of the spatial planning system, known as the Multi-Plan Integration Reform (MPI), arose in the 1990s and continues until today. This contribution explains the origin, evolution, and the results.

Planning Theory & PracticeVol. 26(4)
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Urbanization and City Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spatial Planning Reform in China: The Multi-Plan Integration (MPI) Reform — Lasse Gerrits, Jurian Edelenbos, et al. · Planning Theory & Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS