Understanding Urban Adaptation Policy and Social Justice: A New Conceptual Framework for Just-Oriented Adaptation Policies

Climate change poses one of the most urgent challenges for cities today, creating unprecedented risks for individuals, communities, and various types of infrastructure—social, spatial, and physical. In response, many cities have begun developing and implementing adaptation policies aimed at enhancing their resilience and sustainability. This paper raises an important question about the fairness of these emerging policies and plans: how are adaptation policies and their practical measures distributed equitably among different urban areas, and how do they affect social, racial, ethnic, and other marginalized groups? However, the existing literature on urban adaptation measures is fragmented across various fields of knowledge. There is a notable lack of a cohesive conceptual framework that integrates these adaptation measures. This absence hinders our understanding of the social dimensions of these policies and their equitable distribution among diverse urban groups and neighborhoods, especially when many of them are implemented simultaneously. This paper aims to analyze the socially just aspects of urban adaptation measures and to explore their impact on socially, demographically, ethnically, and gender-diverse populations and groups. The central argument of this paper is that adaptation policies and their associated measures are not merely tools for implementation; rather, adaptation measures serve as significant carriers of social justice. This paper reviews multidisciplinary climate change adaptation policies and measures at the city scale. This analytical review is grounded in Jabareen’s multidisciplinary theory for building a conceptual framework. The analysis yields a new conceptual framework, which we refer to as the Conceptual Framework for Just-Oriented Adaptation Policies. This framework consists of six interconnected concepts of adaptation, with each concept encompassing various measures that collectively contribute to specific aspects of social justice. At the core of this framework lies the ontological concept of defensibility, which underpins adaptation policies aimed at protecting people and urban systems while enhancing the resilience of cities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-05-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104614
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Urban Adaptation Policy and Social Justice: A New Conceptual Framework for Just-Oriented Adaptation Policies

Yosef Jabareen, Deema Abo Elassal
4 citations
Sustainability
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
24.71
article

Understanding Urban Adaptation Policy and Social Justice: A New Conceptual Framework for Just-Oriented Adaptation Policies

Yosef Jabareen, Deema Abo Elassal
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Climate change poses one of the most urgent challenges for cities today, creating unprecedented risks for individuals, communities, and various types of infrastructure—social, spatial, and physical. In response, many cities have begun developing and implementing adaptation policies aimed at enhancing their resilience and sustainability. This paper raises an important question about the fairness of these emerging policies and plans: how are adaptation policies and their practical measures distributed equitably among different urban areas, and how do they affect social, racial, ethnic, and other marginalized groups? However, the existing literature on urban adaptation measures is fragmented across various fields of knowledge. There is a notable lack of a cohesive conceptual framework that integrates these adaptation measures. This absence hinders our understanding of the social dimensions of these policies and their equitable distribution among diverse urban groups and neighborhoods, especially when many of them are implemented simultaneously. This paper aims to analyze the socially just aspects of urban adaptation measures and to explore their impact on socially, demographically, ethnically, and gender-diverse populations and groups. The central argument of this paper is that adaptation policies and their associated measures are not merely tools for implementation; rather, adaptation measures serve as significant carriers of social justice. This paper reviews multidisciplinary climate change adaptation policies and measures at the city scale. This analytical review is grounded in Jabareen’s multidisciplinary theory for building a conceptual framework. The analysis yields a new conceptual framework, which we refer to as the Conceptual Framework for Just-Oriented Adaptation Policies. This framework consists of six interconnected concepts of adaptation, with each concept encompassing various measures that collectively contribute to specific aspects of social justice. At the core of this framework lies the ontological concept of defensibility, which underpins adaptation policies aimed at protecting people and urban systems while enhancing the resilience of cities.

SustainabilityVol. 17(10)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Israel Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
24.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.