Lingual Foramina Anatomy: An Observational Study in Dry Mandibles

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The lingual foramina of the mandible serve as passageways for arterial branches that are susceptible to injury during surgical procedures, potentially leading to varying degrees of hemorrhage. The objective of the present study was to contribute to the quantification and classification of lingual foramina using cadaveric dry mandibles in relation to surgical safety and, especially, to the risk of perioperative bleeding. <b>Methods</b>: This study examined the number, diameter, and spatial relationship of lingual foramina to the genial tubercle, alveolar process, and alveolar crest in dry mandibles. Stainless steel wire threads and Digimatic caliper measurements were utilized. Cluster analysis was employed for the classification of foramina into distinct spatial groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean values among ≥3 groups. <b>Results</b>: A total of 100 dry mandibles were initially analyzed for the presence of lingual foramina with a diameter of ≥2 mm. In 96 of them (50 dentate and 46 edentulous), 387 lingual foramina (mean: 4.03 per mandible) were recognized; the remaining 4 had smaller lingual foramina (diameter <2 mm). Only 4 mandibles (4.2%) exhibited a single lingual foramen, whereas the remaining 92 (95.8%) displayed multiple foramina (up to nine). The observed lingual foramina had a diameter of 0.44 ± 0.02 mm and were located at distances of 8.74 ± 0.54 mm from the genial tubercle, 14.19 ± 0.87 mm from the alveolar crest, and 14.53 ± 0.84 mm from the inferior border of the mandible. Based on their relationship to the genial tubercle, the foramina were classified into four distinct groups: (i) right (27/387-7%), (ii) proximal (254/387-66%), (iii) superior (81/387-21%), and (iv) left (25/387-6%). The superior group exhibited the largest mean diameter (0.52 ± 0.22 mm, ANOVA <i>p</i> < 0.001). The probability of detecting a lingual foramen was minimized at a distance of 13.00 ± 0.50 mm from the genial tubercle, delineating a relatively safe zone with a lower risk of hemorrhage. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study provides anatomical insights that contribute to appropriate preoperative planning and the minimization of complications during surgical interventions on the mandible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13050218
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lingual Foramina Anatomy: An Observational Study in Dry Mandibles

Vasileios Papadopoulos, Zoi Maria Thomaidi, Charalambos Tsatsarelis
1 citations
Dentistry Journal
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
article

Lingual Foramina Anatomy: An Observational Study in Dry Mandibles

Vasileios Papadopoulos, Zoi Maria Thomaidi, Charalambos Tsatsarelis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The lingual foramina of the mandible serve as passageways for arterial branches that are susceptible to injury during surgical procedures, potentially leading to varying degrees of hemorrhage. The objective of the present study was to contribute to the quantification and classification of lingual foramina using cadaveric dry mandibles in relation to surgical safety and, especially, to the risk of perioperative bleeding. <b>Methods</b>: This study examined the number, diameter, and spatial relationship of lingual foramina to the genial tubercle, alveolar process, and alveolar crest in dry mandibles. Stainless steel wire threads and Digimatic caliper measurements were utilized. Cluster analysis was employed for the classification of foramina into distinct spatial groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare mean values among ≥3 groups. <b>Results</b>: A total of 100 dry mandibles were initially analyzed for the presence of lingual foramina with a diameter of ≥2 mm. In 96 of them (50 dentate and 46 edentulous), 387 lingual foramina (mean: 4.03 per mandible) were recognized; the remaining 4 had smaller lingual foramina (diameter <2 mm). Only 4 mandibles (4.2%) exhibited a single lingual foramen, whereas the remaining 92 (95.8%) displayed multiple foramina (up to nine). The observed lingual foramina had a diameter of 0.44 ± 0.02 mm and were located at distances of 8.74 ± 0.54 mm from the genial tubercle, 14.19 ± 0.87 mm from the alveolar crest, and 14.53 ± 0.84 mm from the inferior border of the mandible. Based on their relationship to the genial tubercle, the foramina were classified into four distinct groups: (i) right (27/387-7%), (ii) proximal (254/387-66%), (iii) superior (81/387-21%), and (iv) left (25/387-6%). The superior group exhibited the largest mean diameter (0.52 ± 0.22 mm, ANOVA <i>p</i> < 0.001). The probability of detecting a lingual foramen was minimized at a distance of 13.00 ± 0.50 mm from the genial tubercle, delineating a relatively safe zone with a lower risk of hemorrhage. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study provides anatomical insights that contribute to appropriate preoperative planning and the minimization of complications during surgical interventions on the mandible.

Dentistry JournalVol. 13(5)
Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.