Quality of Life in Patients Aged 60–65 Years Receiving Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement

In patients aged 60-65 years undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement, there is no significant difference in postoperative QOL between those receiving mechanical or bioprosthetic valves, but mechanical valves seemed to perform better in the late period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiac failure review
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2024.40
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Life in Patients Aged 60–65 Years Receiving Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement

Changwei Ren, Yongqiang Lai, Meng He, Jianbo Yu et al.
1 citations
Cardiac failure review
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
article

Quality of Life in Patients Aged 60–65 Years Receiving Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement

Changwei Ren, Yongqiang Lai, Meng He, Jianbo Yu, Hao Cui, Jinwei Zhang, Xiaoqing Gao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In patients aged 60-65 years undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement, there is no significant difference in postoperative QOL between those receiving mechanical or bioprosthetic valves, but mechanical valves seemed to perform better in the late period.

Cardiac failure reviewVol. 11
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Anzhen Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Capital Medical University, National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.