Exploring the Future of Technology Acceptance Models in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

This systematic review examines how traditional Technology Acceptance Models (TAMs) can be adapted to better understand user acceptance of AI technologies. The study analyzed 80 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025, identified through a comprehensive search of EBSCOhost, Embase, Inspec, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using keywords related to AI acceptance factors and technology acceptance models. Our analysis employed descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, and narrative synthesis to identify key factors influencing AI acceptance, including perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust, transparency, explainability, and ethical considerations. We found that trust in AI systems' reliability, fairness, and privacy protection plays a crucial role in user acceptance, with low trust leading to resistance. Transparency and explainability of AI decision-making processes were identified as critical for building user trust. The review also highlights limitations of current research, including inconsistent definitions of AI technologies, inadequate exploration of cultural and contextual differences in AI acceptance, and the predominance of cross-sectional research designs. By addressing these areas, future research can provide a more comprehensive theoretical foundation for understanding user acceptance of AI technologies, guiding the development and ethical application of AI systems. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Trust and Explainability in AI, Technology Acceptance Models (TAM).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Science and Technology Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62341/sfam1509
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Future of Technology Acceptance Models in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Salem Fadlalla Abdalhamid Mansori
International Science and Technology Journal
Technology and Data Analysis
article

Exploring the Future of Technology Acceptance Models in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Salem Fadlalla Abdalhamid Mansori
article en

Abstract

This systematic review examines how traditional Technology Acceptance Models (TAMs) can be adapted to better understand user acceptance of AI technologies. The study analyzed 80 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025, identified through a comprehensive search of EBSCOhost, Embase, Inspec, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using keywords related to AI acceptance factors and technology acceptance models. Our analysis employed descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, and narrative synthesis to identify key factors influencing AI acceptance, including perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, trust, transparency, explainability, and ethical considerations. We found that trust in AI systems' reliability, fairness, and privacy protection plays a crucial role in user acceptance, with low trust leading to resistance. Transparency and explainability of AI decision-making processes were identified as critical for building user trust. The review also highlights limitations of current research, including inconsistent definitions of AI technologies, inadequate exploration of cultural and contextual differences in AI acceptance, and the predominance of cross-sectional research designs. By addressing these areas, future research can provide a more comprehensive theoretical foundation for understanding user acceptance of AI technologies, guiding the development and ethical application of AI systems. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Trust and Explainability in AI, Technology Acceptance Models (TAM).

International Science and Technology JournalVol. 36(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Technology and Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.