Pharmacists' views on the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology

Abstract Background There is increasing interest in the potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology. However, uptake in Australian hospitals is limited. Aim This study sought to explore hospital pharmacists' experiences with TDM in oncology, seeking to determine if they could provide insights into barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Method Hospital oncology/haematology pharmacists ( n = 18) from all Australian states participated in semi‐structured interviews. Interviews explored experiences of TDM, and perceived barriers and facilitators to TDM uptake in oncology. Interviews were analysed using an inductive approach to generate themes. Ethical approval was granted by the St. Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 2022/ETH00533) and the study conforms to the Australian National statement on ethical conduct in human research . Informed consent was obtained from all participants via distribution of project information sheets and the completion of written consent forms. Results Most participants provided care in metropolitan tertiary adult hospitals. They reported that TDM was not used routinely to inform therapy for most oncology drugs, but acknowledged potential benefits, particularly when a concentration–effect relationship is established for efficacy or toxicity. Three themes captured the barriers and facilitators to implementation of TDM in oncology: (1) evidence and knowledge translation, (2) logistics and practicalities, and (3) the clinical team. Conclusion Pharmacists are keen to integrate TDM in oncology patients. Key factors perceived to influence TDM uptake are evidence, knowledge, and logistics (assay availability, funding, staff). Standardised guidance, complemented by clinical champions and pharmacokinetic expertise within the multidisciplinary team, is needed to provide confidence in changing dosing practices. Improved access to relevant drug assays will ensure result turnaround times support dosing decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacists' views on the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology

Jana Stojanova, T Sakellaris, Bridin Murnion, Jane Ellen Carland
1 citations
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
article

Pharmacists' views on the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology

Jana Stojanova, T Sakellaris, Bridin Murnion, Jane Ellen Carland
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background There is increasing interest in the potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in oncology. However, uptake in Australian hospitals is limited. Aim This study sought to explore hospital pharmacists' experiences with TDM in oncology, seeking to determine if they could provide insights into barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Method Hospital oncology/haematology pharmacists ( n = 18) from all Australian states participated in semi‐structured interviews. Interviews explored experiences of TDM, and perceived barriers and facilitators to TDM uptake in oncology. Interviews were analysed using an inductive approach to generate themes. Ethical approval was granted by the St. Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 2022/ETH00533) and the study conforms to the Australian National statement on ethical conduct in human research . Informed consent was obtained from all participants via distribution of project information sheets and the completion of written consent forms. Results Most participants provided care in metropolitan tertiary adult hospitals. They reported that TDM was not used routinely to inform therapy for most oncology drugs, but acknowledged potential benefits, particularly when a concentration–effect relationship is established for efficacy or toxicity. Three themes captured the barriers and facilitators to implementation of TDM in oncology: (1) evidence and knowledge translation, (2) logistics and practicalities, and (3) the clinical team. Conclusion Pharmacists are keen to integrate TDM in oncology patients. Key factors perceived to influence TDM uptake are evidence, knowledge, and logistics (assay availability, funding, staff). Standardised guidance, complemented by clinical champions and pharmacokinetic expertise within the multidisciplinary team, is needed to provide confidence in changing dosing practices. Improved access to relevant drug assays will ensure result turnaround times support dosing decisions.

Journal of Pharmacy Practice and ResearchVol. 55(5)
UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.