Construction of an Integrated Sampling Plan With Adaptable Backtracking and Resampling Mechanisms Based on a Process Capability Index

ABSTRACT Acceptance sampling plans represent an economical method of quality verification. One approach is the single sampling plan; however, scholars have developed more advanced sampling techniques to address its poor cost‐effectiveness, including the multiple‐dependent‐state sampling plan (MDSP) with lot disposition based on historical quality information and the repetitive group sampling plan (RGSP) with resampling. Some researchers have integrated these to design an efficient sampling scheme incorporating lot‐backtracking and resampling mechanisms: the modified RGSP (MRGSP). Studies have highlighted flaws in the MDSP and RGSP sampling mechanisms. The performance of MDSP diminishes with increased lot records, whereas the RGSP may risk infinite resampling. Although improvements have been proposed for these shortcomings, the MRGSP, integrating both mechanisms, still suffers from these drawbacks. We design an integrated sampling plan (ISP) featuring adaptable lot‐backtracking and resampling mechanisms based on the process capability index to address these deficiencies. The proposed ISP reduces the inspection sample size significantly to enhance the cost‐effectiveness of the sampling inspection compared to existing plans. Moreover, because the ISP involves numerous adjustable parameters, creating a complex optimization model, we develop a cloud‐calculation application to assist in obtaining the optimal plan design. Finally, we present a practical case to demonstrate the applicability of ISP.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3805
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construction of an Integrated Sampling Plan With Adaptable Backtracking and Resampling Mechanisms Based on a Process Capability Index

To‐Cheng Wang
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

Construction of an Integrated Sampling Plan With Adaptable Backtracking and Resampling Mechanisms Based on a Process Capability Index

To‐Cheng Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Acceptance sampling plans represent an economical method of quality verification. One approach is the single sampling plan; however, scholars have developed more advanced sampling techniques to address its poor cost‐effectiveness, including the multiple‐dependent‐state sampling plan (MDSP) with lot disposition based on historical quality information and the repetitive group sampling plan (RGSP) with resampling. Some researchers have integrated these to design an efficient sampling scheme incorporating lot‐backtracking and resampling mechanisms: the modified RGSP (MRGSP). Studies have highlighted flaws in the MDSP and RGSP sampling mechanisms. The performance of MDSP diminishes with increased lot records, whereas the RGSP may risk infinite resampling. Although improvements have been proposed for these shortcomings, the MRGSP, integrating both mechanisms, still suffers from these drawbacks. We design an integrated sampling plan (ISP) featuring adaptable lot‐backtracking and resampling mechanisms based on the process capability index to address these deficiencies. The proposed ISP reduces the inspection sample size significantly to enhance the cost‐effectiveness of the sampling inspection compared to existing plans. Moreover, because the ISP involves numerous adjustable parameters, creating a complex optimization model, we develop a cloud‐calculation application to assist in obtaining the optimal plan design. Finally, we present a practical case to demonstrate the applicability of ISP.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 41(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.