Three Latent Factors in Major Depressive Disorder Base on Functional Connectivity Show Different Treatment Preferences

The heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) complicates the selection of effective treatments. While more studies have identified cluster-based MDD subtypes, they often overlook individual variability within subtypes. To address this, we applied latent dirichlet allocation to decompose resting-state functional connectivity (FC) into latent factors. It allows patients to express varying degrees of FC across multiple factors, retaining inter-individual variability. We enrolled 226 patients and 100 healthy controls to identify latent factors and examine their distinct patterns of hyper- and hypo-connectivity. We investigated the association between these connectivity patterns and treatment preferences. Additionally, we compared demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and longitudinal symptom improvements across the identified factors. We identified three factors. Factor 1, characterized by inter-network hyperconnectivity of the default mode network (DMN), was associated with treatment response to antidepressant monotherapy. Additionally, factor 1 was more frequently expressed by younger and highly educated patients, with significant improvements in cognitive symptoms. Conversely, factor 3, characterized by inter-networks and intra-networks hypoconnectivity of DMN, was associated with treatment response when combining antidepressants with stimulation therapy. Factor 2, characterized by global hypoconnectivity without DMN, was associated with higher baseline depression severity and anxiety symptoms. These three factors showed distinct treatment preferences and clinical characteristics. Importantly, our results suggested that patients with DMN hyperconnectivity benefited from monotherapy, while those with DMN hypoconnectivity benefited from combined treatments. Our approach allows for a unique composition of factors in each individual, potentially facilitating the development of more personalized treatment-related biomarkers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Brain Mapping
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70215
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three Latent Factors in Major Depressive Disorder Base on Functional Connectivity Show Different Treatment Preferences

Junneng Shao, Zhijian Yao, Qing Lü, Zhilu Chen et al.
2 citations
Human Brain Mapping
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
article

Three Latent Factors in Major Depressive Disorder Base on Functional Connectivity Show Different Treatment Preferences

Junneng Shao, Zhijian Yao, Qing Lü, Zhilu Chen, Xinyi Wang, Xue Li, Xinruo Wei
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) complicates the selection of effective treatments. While more studies have identified cluster-based MDD subtypes, they often overlook individual variability within subtypes. To address this, we applied latent dirichlet allocation to decompose resting-state functional connectivity (FC) into latent factors. It allows patients to express varying degrees of FC across multiple factors, retaining inter-individual variability. We enrolled 226 patients and 100 healthy controls to identify latent factors and examine their distinct patterns of hyper- and hypo-connectivity. We investigated the association between these connectivity patterns and treatment preferences. Additionally, we compared demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and longitudinal symptom improvements across the identified factors. We identified three factors. Factor 1, characterized by inter-network hyperconnectivity of the default mode network (DMN), was associated with treatment response to antidepressant monotherapy. Additionally, factor 1 was more frequently expressed by younger and highly educated patients, with significant improvements in cognitive symptoms. Conversely, factor 3, characterized by inter-networks and intra-networks hypoconnectivity of DMN, was associated with treatment response when combining antidepressants with stimulation therapy. Factor 2, characterized by global hypoconnectivity without DMN, was associated with higher baseline depression severity and anxiety symptoms. These three factors showed distinct treatment preferences and clinical characteristics. Importantly, our results suggested that patients with DMN hyperconnectivity benefited from monotherapy, while those with DMN hypoconnectivity benefited from combined treatments. Our approach allows for a unique composition of factors in each individual, potentially facilitating the development of more personalized treatment-related biomarkers.

Human Brain MappingVol. 46(8)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN), Nanjing Brain Hospital (CN), Southeast University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Nanjing Normal University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.