Anchorage Effect for Steel Truss–Inserted Steel–Concrete Composite Wall Embedded in RC Foundation

Connections of steel–concrete composite walls (SCWs) to the foundation act essentially in seismic performances of buildings or constructions with SCW. A steel truss–inserted steel–concrete composite wall (STSCW) is often embedded in a RC foundation. The interaction between STSCW and RC foundation significantly influences the seismic performances of STSCWs, including the stiffness, strength, and hysteretic behavior. To examine such anchorage effect, a sophisticated finite-element model (FEM) is built and calibrated by experimental results. It was identified that four elements, including the stirrups, longitudinal rebars, steel anchoring plates, and interaction between concrete and STSCW, affect the anchorage performance significantly. A simplified mechanical model is then proposed, which modeled the four elements by nonlinear springs. Further, a general boundary condition model of STSCWs is developed, where the vertical, horizontal and rotation springs provide realistic constraints for STSCWs, with the stiffness error less than 6% compared with the experimental results. The embedding strength of the connection can be calculated by an iterative procedure. It was found that the yield of stirrups and longitudinal rebars would weaken the stiffness of the embedding connection. As the weld between the chord and the steel anchoring plate fails, the connection reaches the ultimate strength. The embedding strength is primarily determined by the embedded depth, hcon, and the axial force ratio, nd. It is concluded that the connection can be treated as full-strength connection except STSCW3 due to a large axial force ratio of 0.7. To prevent a premature failure to the embedding connection of STSCW3, the embedded depth should be increased to 1,000 mm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-14210
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anchorage Effect for Steel Truss–Inserted Steel–Concrete Composite Wall Embedded in RC Foundation

Qian-Han Li, Jia‐Bao Yan, Kaiyuan Xu, Jie Chen et al.
Journal of Structural Engineering
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Anchorage Effect for Steel Truss–Inserted Steel–Concrete Composite Wall Embedded in RC Foundation

Qian-Han Li, Jia‐Bao Yan, Kaiyuan Xu, Jie Chen, Tao Wang, Xiaoting Wang
article en

Abstract

Connections of steel–concrete composite walls (SCWs) to the foundation act essentially in seismic performances of buildings or constructions with SCW. A steel truss–inserted steel–concrete composite wall (STSCW) is often embedded in a RC foundation. The interaction between STSCW and RC foundation significantly influences the seismic performances of STSCWs, including the stiffness, strength, and hysteretic behavior. To examine such anchorage effect, a sophisticated finite-element model (FEM) is built and calibrated by experimental results. It was identified that four elements, including the stirrups, longitudinal rebars, steel anchoring plates, and interaction between concrete and STSCW, affect the anchorage performance significantly. A simplified mechanical model is then proposed, which modeled the four elements by nonlinear springs. Further, a general boundary condition model of STSCWs is developed, where the vertical, horizontal and rotation springs provide realistic constraints for STSCWs, with the stiffness error less than 6% compared with the experimental results. The embedding strength of the connection can be calculated by an iterative procedure. It was found that the yield of stirrups and longitudinal rebars would weaken the stiffness of the embedding connection. As the weld between the chord and the steel anchoring plate fails, the connection reaches the ultimate strength. The embedding strength is primarily determined by the embedded depth, hcon, and the axial force ratio, nd. It is concluded that the connection can be treated as full-strength connection except STSCW3 due to a large axial force ratio of 0.7. To prevent a premature failure to the embedding connection of STSCW3, the embedded depth should be increased to 1,000 mm.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 151(8)
Tianjin University (CN), China Earthquake Administration (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.