Are There Differences in 2-Year Outcomes Between Two-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Versus Single-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion to Treat Cervical Myelopathy? A Quality Outcomes Database Study

This study suggests that both ACDF and ACCF procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy are able to achieve similar, clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs by 2 years. Patients undergoing single-level ACCF have more estimated blood loss and longer length of stay, as well as worse baseline myelopathy. Both procedures have efficacious, durable outcomes. It is reasonable that other factors, such as radiographic characteristics and patient symptoms, may influence patient selection for ACDF vs ACCF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgery
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003518
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are There Differences in 2-Year Outcomes Between Two-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Versus Single-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion to Treat Cervical Myelopathy? A Quality Outcomes Database Study

Erica F. Bisson, Mark E. Shaffrey, Paul Park, Mohamad Bydon et al.
1 links
Neurosurgery
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Are There Differences in 2-Year Outcomes Between Two-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion Versus Single-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion to Treat Cervical Myelopathy? A Quality Outcomes Database Study

Erica F. Bisson, Mark E. Shaffrey, Paul Park, Mohamad Bydon, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Cheerag D. Upadhyaya, Oren N. Gottfried, Andrew K. Chan, Juan S. Uribe, Luis M. Tumialán, Kevin T. Foley, Connor Berlin, Domagoj Coric, Sufyan Ibrahim, Michael S. Virk, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Dean Chou, John J. Knightly, Eric A. Potts, Jay D. Turner, Kai-Ming Fu, Michael Y. Wang, Anthony L. Asher, Scott A. Meyer, Regis W. Haid, Chun‐Po Yen
article en

Abstract

This study suggests that both ACDF and ACCF procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy are able to achieve similar, clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs by 2 years. Patients undergoing single-level ACCF have more estimated blood loss and longer length of stay, as well as worse baseline myelopathy. Both procedures have efficacious, durable outcomes. It is reasonable that other factors, such as radiographic characteristics and patient symptoms, may influence patient selection for ACDF vs ACCF.

NeurosurgeryVol. 97(5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Barrow Neurological Institute (US), St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center (US), Mayo Clinic (US), University of Miami (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), Carolinas Medical Center (US), WinnMed (US), Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates (US), Semmes Murphey Foundation (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Indiana Spine Group (US), Duke University Hospital (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), University of Virginia (US), Columbia University (US)
Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.