Long-term field study on corn response to sulfur fertilization in Iowa, USA

Declines in atmospheric sulfur (S) deposition and S removal through cropping have increased response to S fertilization in many crops. Yet, responses to S fertilization by corn ( Zea mays L.) have been inconsistent. We aimed to: (i) determine corn grain yield response to S fertilizer; (ii) evaluate pre-plant soil S and plant S at different growth stages as S diagnostic methods of corn S status; and (iii) explore the cost-effectiveness of S sources under historical and current market price conditions. Twelve field experiments were conducted in central Iowa, USA, to evaluate corn response to ammonium sulfate (AMS), ammonium thiosulfate (ATS), and gypsum (GYP) applied at 34 kg S ha −1 . Extractable soil S was measured before planting, and S concentrations in plants at V5, in ear leaves at mid-silk R1 stage, and in grain were determined. Grain yield was measured at R6. Sulfur fertilization increased S concentration in 50 % of trials at V5, 33 % at mid-silk, and 30 % in grain. Grain yield increased in only 17 % of trials (6.2–34 % greater than the control). Extractable S, soil organic matter, and S concentration in corn tissue failed as predictors of grain yield response. Economic return from S fertilization via AMS and ATS was positive at current price levels (average return up to $ 27.6 ha −1 ), after accounting for the value of N in the fertilizer. Overall, our results showed that S application may improve early season S uptake by the corn plant but rarely increases grain yield. However, long-term positive economic returns are possible. • Corn grain yield and plant sulfur (S) responses to S fertilizer were evaluated. • Three S sources (AMS, ATS, and gypsum) were compared in 2006–2017 field trials. • Grain yield increased in response to S fertilization in only two of 12 field trials. • Soil S, O.M., and S in plant tissues failed as S diagnostic methods. • S fertilization led to positive economic returns in 50 % of trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Crops Research
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109990
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term field study on corn response to sulfur fertilization in Iowa, USA

Richard Roth, Cecilia Crespo, Sabrina J. Ruis, John L. Kovar et al.
2 citations
Field Crops Research
Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
1.61
article

Long-term field study on corn response to sulfur fertilization in Iowa, USA

Richard Roth, Cecilia Crespo, Sabrina J. Ruis, John L. Kovar, Peter O’Brien, Chad E. Hart
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Declines in atmospheric sulfur (S) deposition and S removal through cropping have increased response to S fertilization in many crops. Yet, responses to S fertilization by corn ( Zea mays L.) have been inconsistent. We aimed to: (i) determine corn grain yield response to S fertilizer; (ii) evaluate pre-plant soil S and plant S at different growth stages as S diagnostic methods of corn S status; and (iii) explore the cost-effectiveness of S sources under historical and current market price conditions. Twelve field experiments were conducted in central Iowa, USA, to evaluate corn response to ammonium sulfate (AMS), ammonium thiosulfate (ATS), and gypsum (GYP) applied at 34 kg S ha −1 . Extractable soil S was measured before planting, and S concentrations in plants at V5, in ear leaves at mid-silk R1 stage, and in grain were determined. Grain yield was measured at R6. Sulfur fertilization increased S concentration in 50 % of trials at V5, 33 % at mid-silk, and 30 % in grain. Grain yield increased in only 17 % of trials (6.2–34 % greater than the control). Extractable S, soil organic matter, and S concentration in corn tissue failed as predictors of grain yield response. Economic return from S fertilization via AMS and ATS was positive at current price levels (average return up to $ 27.6 ha −1 ), after accounting for the value of N in the fertilizer. Overall, our results showed that S application may improve early season S uptake by the corn plant but rarely increases grain yield. However, long-term positive economic returns are possible. • Corn grain yield and plant sulfur (S) responses to S fertilizer were evaluated. • Three S sources (AMS, ATS, and gypsum) were compared in 2006–2017 field trials. • Grain yield increased in response to S fertilization in only two of 12 field trials. • Soil S, O.M., and S in plant tissues failed as S diagnostic methods. • S fertilization led to positive economic returns in 50 % of trials.

Field Crops ResearchVol. 330
Iowa State University (US), National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (US), Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.