Examining Computer Science Educators’ Professional Identity: Computer Science Teacher Identity Survey and Profiles

The rapid pace of technological advancement and its immersive impact on our society underscores the need for all students to acquire fundamental knowledge and skills in computer science. Teachers are critical to the efforts to expand access and equity in computer science education. Developing teachers’ knowledge, practice, and professional identity is one of the key standards for effective teachers. This study delves into the landscape of American computer science educators from the lens of teacher identity. Using survey data from 2,337 educators, we further developed and tested a measure of teacher identity specific to teachers of computer science. By investigating their sense of professional identity, this study identified five distinct profiles of computer science educators: committed, confident, and well-resourced proponents; committed, confident, but under-resourced proponents; moderates; unconfident and under-resourced proponents; and uncommitted, unconfident, and under-resourced skeptics. We further examined the professional backgrounds and teaching contexts of those educators in each profile. This study contributes a validated tool for understanding computer science teacher identity, offering empirical insights informing the preparation and development of effective educators for teaching computer science in schools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computing Education
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3729537
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Computer Science Educators’ Professional Identity: Computer Science Teacher Identity Survey and Profiles

Jason Bohrer, Yan Tian, Lijun Ni, Jake Baskin et al.
1 citations
ACM Transactions on Computing Education
Gender and Technology in Education
3.87
article

Examining Computer Science Educators’ Professional Identity: Computer Science Teacher Identity Survey and Profiles

Jason Bohrer, Yan Tian, Lijun Ni, Jake Baskin, Tom McKlin, Han Hao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid pace of technological advancement and its immersive impact on our society underscores the need for all students to acquire fundamental knowledge and skills in computer science. Teachers are critical to the efforts to expand access and equity in computer science education. Developing teachers’ knowledge, practice, and professional identity is one of the key standards for effective teachers. This study delves into the landscape of American computer science educators from the lens of teacher identity. Using survey data from 2,337 educators, we further developed and tested a measure of teacher identity specific to teachers of computer science. By investigating their sense of professional identity, this study identified five distinct profiles of computer science educators: committed, confident, and well-resourced proponents; committed, confident, but under-resourced proponents; moderates; unconfident and under-resourced proponents; and uncommitted, unconfident, and under-resourced skeptics. We further examined the professional backgrounds and teaching contexts of those educators in each profile. This study contributes a validated tool for understanding computer science teacher identity, offering empirical insights informing the preparation and development of effective educators for teaching computer science in schools.

ACM Transactions on Computing EducationVol. 25(3)
Albany State University (US), National Science Teachers Association (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Tarleton State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender and Technology in Education
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.