Comparative evaluation of viral concentration and extraction protocols for wastewater-based epidemiology of respiratory viruses

Introduction:Wastewater-Based Epidemiology (WBE) enables early detection and monitoring of infectious diseases, but the lack of standardization in viral concentration and extraction methods challenges data reliability.Objectives: This study compared three protocols using magnetic bead-based viral concentration and automated nucleic acid extraction for detecting SARS-CoV-2 (SC2), Influenza A (FLUA), Influenza B (FLUB), and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in wastewater.Methodology: Wastewater samples from Rio de Janeiro (February 2025) were divided into three aliquots, each processed with a different protocol: P1 (magnetic nanoparticles + automated extractor), P2 (same concentration method, different extractor), and P3 (integrated concentration and extraction).Synthetic wastewater spiked with target viruses validated the methods.Viral detection was performed using RT-PCR and digital PCR (dPCR -Qiacuity) with a 5plex assay developed by Bio-Manguinhos.Results: P3 had the highest detection rates and viral concentrations (SC2: 78.9%, 196.76 copies/mL; FLUA: 63.2%, 315.41 copies/mL), followed by P1 (SC2: 73.7%, 9.77 copies/mL; FLUA: 57.9%, 11.60 copies/mL) and P2 (SC2: 57.9%, 54.78 copies/mL; FLUA: 21.1%, 80.04 copies/mL).FLUB was best detected by P3 (42.1%, 302.44 copies/mL), with lower recoveries for P2 (26.3%, 76.38 copies/mL) and P1 (15.8%, 10.10 copies/mL).RSV detection was low overall, with P3 performing best (57.9%, 193.17 copies/mL), followed by P2 (42.1%, 41.27 copies/mL) and P1 (36.8%, 6.14 copies/mL).dPCR increased sensitivity by up to 20%, with high agreement for SC2 (>85%), moderate for FLUA and FLUB (~70%), and lower for RSV (~60%).Internal control recovery was consistent, confirming methodological reliability. Conclusion:P3 demonstrated superior viral recovery, making it the most effective for WBE.P1 showed intermediate performance, especially for SC2 and FLUA, while P2 had the lowest detection rates, particularly for RSV and FLUA.dPCR improved sensitivity, reinforcing its utility for detecting low viral concentrations.Standardizing methods is essential for reliable WBE applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35259/isi.2025_70121
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of viral concentration and extraction protocols for wastewater-based epidemiology of respiratory viruses

Gabrielle Coelho, Kátia Valevski Sales Fernandes, Marilda Mendonça Siqueira, Lara Henriques et al.
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
article

Comparative evaluation of viral concentration and extraction protocols for wastewater-based epidemiology of respiratory viruses

Gabrielle Coelho, Kátia Valevski Sales Fernandes, Marilda Mendonça Siqueira, Lara Henriques, Pedro Henrique Cardoso, Maria de Lourdes Aguiar Oliveira, Renan Faustino, Sabrina Alberti Nóbrega de Oliveira, Patrícia Baptista, Mônica Arruda
article en

Abstract

Introduction:Wastewater-Based Epidemiology (WBE) enables early detection and monitoring of infectious diseases, but the lack of standardization in viral concentration and extraction methods challenges data reliability.Objectives: This study compared three protocols using magnetic bead-based viral concentration and automated nucleic acid extraction for detecting SARS-CoV-2 (SC2), Influenza A (FLUA), Influenza B (FLUB), and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in wastewater.Methodology: Wastewater samples from Rio de Janeiro (February 2025) were divided into three aliquots, each processed with a different protocol: P1 (magnetic nanoparticles + automated extractor), P2 (same concentration method, different extractor), and P3 (integrated concentration and extraction).Synthetic wastewater spiked with target viruses validated the methods.Viral detection was performed using RT-PCR and digital PCR (dPCR -Qiacuity) with a 5plex assay developed by Bio-Manguinhos.Results: P3 had the highest detection rates and viral concentrations (SC2: 78.9%, 196.76 copies/mL; FLUA: 63.2%, 315.41 copies/mL), followed by P1 (SC2: 73.7%, 9.77 copies/mL; FLUA: 57.9%, 11.60 copies/mL) and P2 (SC2: 57.9%, 54.78 copies/mL; FLUA: 21.1%, 80.04 copies/mL).FLUB was best detected by P3 (42.1%, 302.44 copies/mL), with lower recoveries for P2 (26.3%, 76.38 copies/mL) and P1 (15.8%, 10.10 copies/mL).RSV detection was low overall, with P3 performing best (57.9%, 193.17 copies/mL), followed by P2 (42.1%, 41.27 copies/mL) and P1 (36.8%, 6.14 copies/mL).dPCR increased sensitivity by up to 20%, with high agreement for SC2 (>85%), moderate for FLUA and FLUB (~70%), and lower for RSV (~60%).Internal control recovery was consistent, confirming methodological reliability. Conclusion:P3 demonstrated superior viral recovery, making it the most effective for WBE.P1 showed intermediate performance, especially for SC2 and FLUA, while P2 had the lowest detection rates, particularly for RSV and FLUA.dPCR improved sensitivity, reinforcing its utility for detecting low viral concentrations.Standardizing methods is essential for reliable WBE applications.

Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.