Impact of margin distance on recurrence and survival following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Current evidence does not support the application of "no-ink-on-tumor" negative margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer (BC) patients who have received neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). We compared loco-regional free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) based on different tumor margin distance thresholds in a cohort of 235 BC patients treated with NST and subsequent BCS between 01/2015 and 12/2019. The 5-year LRFS was 81.6% in patients with "no-ink-on-tumour", margins and 71.0% in those with positive margins (p = 0.584). Margins >1 mm were associated with superior outcomes, with a 5-year LRFS of 84.0% compared to 69.3% in patients with margins ≤1 mm (p = 0.005). Additionally, margins >1 mm were significantly correlated with longer DFS (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.001). These findings suggest that a surgical margin distance >1 mm provides the best LRFS, DFS, and OS outcomes for this group of BC patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Breast Cancer
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-025-00756-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of margin distance on recurrence and survival following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Antoine Desmet, Denis Larsimont, Isabelle Veys, Paulus Kristanto et al.
3 citations
npj Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
2.81
article

Impact of margin distance on recurrence and survival following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Antoine Desmet, Denis Larsimont, Isabelle Veys, Paulus Kristanto, Catalin‐Florin Pop, Filip De Neubourg, Chirine Khaled, Evandro de Azambuja, Clémence Ortega, Mathilde Lecomte
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Current evidence does not support the application of "no-ink-on-tumor" negative margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer (BC) patients who have received neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). We compared loco-regional free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) based on different tumor margin distance thresholds in a cohort of 235 BC patients treated with NST and subsequent BCS between 01/2015 and 12/2019. The 5-year LRFS was 81.6% in patients with "no-ink-on-tumour", margins and 71.0% in those with positive margins (p = 0.584). Margins >1 mm were associated with superior outcomes, with a 5-year LRFS of 84.0% compared to 69.3% in patients with margins ≤1 mm (p = 0.005). Additionally, margins >1 mm were significantly correlated with longer DFS (p = 0.028) and OS (p = 0.001). These findings suggest that a surgical margin distance >1 mm provides the best LRFS, DFS, and OS outcomes for this group of BC patients.

npj Breast CancerVol. 11(1)
Institut Jules Bordet (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
2.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.