<scp>VISITECT</scp>® <scp>CD4</scp> advanced disease assay in routine use: Diagnostic accuracy and usability, Ethiopia and Indonesia
We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and usability of the rapid semiquantitative point of care VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay, compared to routinely obtained CD4 counts among people living with HIV in Ethiopia and Indonesia. We consecutively enrolled people living with HIV aged ≥10 years who were newly diagnosed, had interrupted antiretroviral treatment for ≥3 months, or were feeling unwell. Venous blood was drawn to obtain CD4 counts on routinely available test instruments and a VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay result. The sensitivity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was high (97.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.4-99.4%), but the specificity was low (32.7%, 95%CI, 27.9-37.8%). It significantly increased to 42.5% (95%CI, 33.2-52.1%) after retraining of laboratory staff, but remained low. The low specificity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was due to poor capacity in test reading by routine staff. Reading the test strip is error-prone and requires intensive and regular training. Reading aids may improve the usability of this essential point of care test.
Authors
- Pamela Hepple
- Bihil Sherefdin
- Ahmed Bedru
- Petra de Haas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-0198)
- Andrii Slyzkyi
- Misikir Amare
- Yohannes Babo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0444-1407)
- Erni Juwita Nelwan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-5412)
- Edine Tiemersma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2071-3038)
- Jhon Sugiharto
- Francisca Srioetami
- Denisa Widyaputri
Institutions
- TuBerculosis Vaccine Initiative (NL)
- University of Indonesia (ID)
- Ethiopian Public Health Institute (ET)
- Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Published
- 2025-05-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.14124
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.79