Limitations of tensor-network approaches for optimization and sampling: A comparison to quantum and classical Ising machines

In the ever-evolving landscape of computational science, tensor networks have emerged as a versatile toolset to simulate both quantum and classical many-body systems. This study investigates their applicability to complex optimization problems, where quantum annealing devices have generated significant interest. A challenge in applying tensor networks here is the high connectivity of the devices, which this work effectively leverages by utilizing sparse structures in construction, plus hardware acceleration. The authors quantify the limitations of their deterministic approach, and find that in certain scenarios it might outperform quantum annealers or randomized classical solvers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Applied
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.23.054049
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of tensor-network approaches for optimization and sampling: A comparison to quantum and classical Ising machines

Tomasz Śmierzchalski, Marek M. Rams, Masoud Mohseni, Bartłomiej Gardas et al.
2 citations
Physical Review Applied
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
article

Limitations of tensor-network approaches for optimization and sampling: A comparison to quantum and classical Ising machines

Tomasz Śmierzchalski, Marek M. Rams, Masoud Mohseni, Bartłomiej Gardas, Anna Maria Dziubyna
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the ever-evolving landscape of computational science, tensor networks have emerged as a versatile toolset to simulate both quantum and classical many-body systems. This study investigates their applicability to complex optimization problems, where quantum annealing devices have generated significant interest. A challenge in applying tensor networks here is the high connectivity of the devices, which this work effectively leverages by utilizing sparse structures in construction, plus hardware acceleration. The authors quantify the limitations of their deterministic approach, and find that in certain scenarios it might outperform quantum annealers or randomized classical solvers.

Physical Review AppliedVol. 23(5)
Jagiellonian University (PL), Hewlett-Packard (United States) (US), Exact Sciences (United States) (US), Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics (PL), Institute of Theoretical Physics (CN), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Air Force Research Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Limitations of tensor-network approaches for optimization and sampling: A comparison to quantum and classical Ising machines — Tomasz Śmierzchalski, Marek M. Rams, et al. · Physical Review Applied (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS