Contrasting impacts of nitrogen enrichment on soil nematode diversity in natural and managed ecosystems

Abstract Soil nematode communities are increasingly subjected to pressures from multiple global change drivers, such as nitrogen (N) enrichment and land management practices. Although the critical role of N inputs in regulating soil nematode communities has been well studied, the contrasting responses of soil nematode diversity to N enrichment in natural versus managed ecosystems remain poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we conduct a global meta‐analysis using 3323 paired observations from 173 publications to quantify the impacts of mineral N inputs on the richness and abundance of soil nematode diversity across natural ecosystems (e.g. unmanaged grasslands and forests) and managed ecosystems (e.g. croplands). N enrichment significantly reduced the richness and abundance of soil nematode communities in natural ecosystems, primarily driven by the prohibiting effects of N enrichment‐induced soil ammonium toxicity and soil acidification on the abundances of plant‐feeding, fungal‐feeding and omnivorous‐carnivorous nematodes. In contrast, while N enrichment reduced the taxon richness of soil nematodes in managed ecosystems, it did not diminish their total abundance. This discrepancy may be explained by the increased soil microbial biomass under N enrichment, which favoured the dominance of bacterial‐feeding nematodes. These nematodes thrived at the expense of other trophic guilds with low resource competitiveness and high N sensitivities, leading to a loss of species diversity but maintaining overall community abundance. Furthermore, the responses of soil nematode richness and abundance to N enrichment in managed ecosystems were not regulated by N addition regimes and climate factors. This suggests that management practices may override the constraints imposed by climate change on nematode diversity. Synthesis and application. Our findings demonstrate that N enrichment exerts a greater negative impact on soil nematode diversity in natural ecosystems compared with managed cropping systems, which arises from the distinct responses of different soil nematode trophic guilds to management practices and environmental changes. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the contrasting effects of N enrichment on soil nematode diversity in natural versus managed ecosystems is critical for enhancing the ecological resilience of soil food webs and sustaining soil biodiversity in the face of global change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70072
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting impacts of nitrogen enrichment on soil nematode diversity in natural and managed ecosystems

Xing Wen, Jingyi Ding, Yongfei Bai, Dima Chen et al.
2 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Nematode management and characterization studies
3.50
article

Contrasting impacts of nitrogen enrichment on soil nematode diversity in natural and managed ecosystems

Xing Wen, Jingyi Ding, Yongfei Bai, Dima Chen, Xinli Chen, Xiaoming Lu, Yi Li, Nan-Quan Lou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil nematode communities are increasingly subjected to pressures from multiple global change drivers, such as nitrogen (N) enrichment and land management practices. Although the critical role of N inputs in regulating soil nematode communities has been well studied, the contrasting responses of soil nematode diversity to N enrichment in natural versus managed ecosystems remain poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, we conduct a global meta‐analysis using 3323 paired observations from 173 publications to quantify the impacts of mineral N inputs on the richness and abundance of soil nematode diversity across natural ecosystems (e.g. unmanaged grasslands and forests) and managed ecosystems (e.g. croplands). N enrichment significantly reduced the richness and abundance of soil nematode communities in natural ecosystems, primarily driven by the prohibiting effects of N enrichment‐induced soil ammonium toxicity and soil acidification on the abundances of plant‐feeding, fungal‐feeding and omnivorous‐carnivorous nematodes. In contrast, while N enrichment reduced the taxon richness of soil nematodes in managed ecosystems, it did not diminish their total abundance. This discrepancy may be explained by the increased soil microbial biomass under N enrichment, which favoured the dominance of bacterial‐feeding nematodes. These nematodes thrived at the expense of other trophic guilds with low resource competitiveness and high N sensitivities, leading to a loss of species diversity but maintaining overall community abundance. Furthermore, the responses of soil nematode richness and abundance to N enrichment in managed ecosystems were not regulated by N addition regimes and climate factors. This suggests that management practices may override the constraints imposed by climate change on nematode diversity. Synthesis and application. Our findings demonstrate that N enrichment exerts a greater negative impact on soil nematode diversity in natural ecosystems compared with managed cropping systems, which arises from the distinct responses of different soil nematode trophic guilds to management practices and environmental changes. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the contrasting effects of N enrichment on soil nematode diversity in natural versus managed ecosystems is critical for enhancing the ecological resilience of soil food webs and sustaining soil biodiversity in the face of global change.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(7)
University of Alberta (CA), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Beijing Normal University (CN), Inner Mongolia University (CN), Beijing Botanical Garden (CN), Institute of Botany (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nematode management and characterization studies
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.