Advantages of two quantum programming platforms in quantum computing and quantum chemistry

Quantum computing is at the forefront of technological advancement and has the potential to revolutionize various fields, including quantum chemistry. Choosing an appropriate quantum programming language becomes critical as quantum education and research increase. In this paper, we comprehensively compare two leading quantum programming languages, Qiskit and PennyLane, focusing on their suitability for teaching and research. We delve into their basic and advanced usage, examine their learning curves, and evaluate their capabilities in quantum computing experiments. We also demonstrate using a quantum programming language to build a half adder and a machine learning model. Our study reveals that each language has distinct advantages. While PennyLane excels in research applications due to its flexibility to adjust parameters in detail and access multiple sources of real quantum devices, Qiskit stands out in education because of its web-based graphical user interface and smaller code size. The codes and the dataset used in the studies are available at https://github.com/wangpeihua1231/quantum-programming-platform .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cheminformatics
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-025-01026-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advantages of two quantum programming platforms in quantum computing and quantum chemistry

C. Lee, Yufeng Jane Tseng, Jon‐Chao Hong, Peihua Wang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cheminformatics
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
2.48
article

Advantages of two quantum programming platforms in quantum computing and quantum chemistry

C. Lee, Yufeng Jane Tseng, Jon‐Chao Hong, Peihua Wang, W. Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quantum computing is at the forefront of technological advancement and has the potential to revolutionize various fields, including quantum chemistry. Choosing an appropriate quantum programming language becomes critical as quantum education and research increase. In this paper, we comprehensively compare two leading quantum programming languages, Qiskit and PennyLane, focusing on their suitability for teaching and research. We delve into their basic and advanced usage, examine their learning curves, and evaluate their capabilities in quantum computing experiments. We also demonstrate using a quantum programming language to build a half adder and a machine learning model. Our study reveals that each language has distinct advantages. While PennyLane excels in research applications due to its flexibility to adjust parameters in detail and access multiple sources of real quantum devices, Qiskit stands out in education because of its web-based graphical user interface and smaller code size. The codes and the dataset used in the studies are available at https://github.com/wangpeihua1231/quantum-programming-platform .

Journal of CheminformaticsVol. 17(1)
Chung Yuan Christian University (TW), National Taiwan University (TW), National Center for Theoretical Sciences (TW)
Ministry of Education, India, National Taiwan University, National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.